Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:58:32.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tameness and geodesic cores of subgroups

Part of: Low-dimensional topology Topological manifolds Special aspects of infinite or finite groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Rita Gitik
Rita Gitik
Affiliation:
A & H Consultants Ann Arbor, MI 48104 USA e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let N be a finitely generated normal subgroup of a finitely generated group G. We show that if the trivial subgroup is tame in the factor group G/N, then N is that in G. We also give a short new proof of the fact that quasiconvex subgroups of negatively curved groups are tame. The proof utilizes the concept of the geodesic core of the subgroup and is related to the Dehn algorithm.

MSC classification

Secondary: 57M07: Topological methods in group theory 57M30: Wild knots and surfaces, etc., wild embeddings 57N10: Topology of general $3$-manifolds 20F34: Fundamental groups and their automorphisms
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 69 , Issue 2 , October 2000 , pp. 153 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2000

References

[Bon]Bonahon, F., ‘Bouts ses variétés hyperboliques de dimension 3’, Ann. of Math. 124 (1986), 71–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Gab]Gabai, D., ‘Problems in foliations and laminations’, in: AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics vol. 2 part 2 (ed. Kazez, W.), (AMS and International Press, Providence, 1997) pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
[Git]Gitik, R., ‘On quasiconvex subgroups of negatively curved groups’, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 119 (1997), 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Gro]Gromov, M., ‘Hyperbolic groups’, in: Essays in group theory (ed. Gersten, S. M.) MSRI publications vol. 8 (Springer, New York, 1987), pp. 75–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Kir]Kirby, R., ‘Problems in low-dimensional topology’, in: AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics vol. 2 part 2 (ed. Kazez, W.) (AMS and International Press, Providence, 1997) pp. 35–473.Google Scholar
[Mil]Mihalik, M., ‘Compactifying coverings of 3-manifolds’, Comment. Math. Helv. 71 (1996), 362–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Mi2]Mihalik, M., ‘Group extensions and tame pairs’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 351 (1999), 1095–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Poé]Poénaru, V., ‘Almost convex groups, Lipschitz combing, and π1∞ for universal covering spaces of closed 3-manifolds’, J. Differential Geom. 35 (1992), 103–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Sim]Simon, J., ‘Compactification of covering spaces of compact 3-manifolds’, Michigan Math. J. 23 (1976), 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Thu]Thurston, W., Geometry and topology of 3-manifolds (Princeton University, Princeton, 1978).Google Scholar
[Tuc]Tucker, T. W., ‘Non-compact 3-manifolds and the missing boundary problem’, Topology 13 (1974), 267–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar