Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:35:37.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

POSITIVE LAWS ON LARGE SETS OF GENERATORS: COUNTEREXAMPLES FOR INFINITELY GENERATED GROUPS

Part of: Structure and classification of infinite or finite groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2011

CRISTINA ACCIARRI  and
GUSTAVO A. FERNÁNDEZ-ALCOBER
CRISTINA ACCIARRI
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Matematica Pura ed Applicata, Università degli Studi dell’Aquila, I-67010 Coppito, L’Aquila, Italy (email: [email protected])
GUSTAVO A. FERNÁNDEZ-ALCOBER*
Affiliation:
Matematika Saila, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, 48080 Bilbao, Spain (email: [email protected])
*
✉For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Shumyatsky and the second author proved that if G is a finitely generated residually finite p-group satisfying a law, then, for almost all primes p, the fact that a normal and commutator-closed set of generators satisfies a positive law implies that the whole of G also satisfies a (possibly different) positive law. In this paper, we construct a counterexample showing that the hypothesis of finite generation of the group G cannot be dispensed with.

Keywords

positive lawsresidually finite p-groups

MSC classification

Secondary: 20E99: None of the above, but in this section
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 89 , Issue 3 , December 2010 , pp. 289 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc. 2011

Footnotes

The authors are supported by the Spanish government, grant MTM2008-06680-C02-02, partly with FEDER funds, and by the Basque government, grants IT-252-07 and IT-460-10. The first author is also supported by a grant of the University of L’Aquila.

References

[1]Bajorska, B. and Macedońska, O., ‘On positive law problems in the class of locally graded groups’, Comm. Algebra 32 (2004), 1841–1846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Burns, R. G. and Medvedev, Yu., ‘Groups laws implying virtual nilpotence’, J. Aust. Math. Soc. 74 (2003), 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Cox, D., Little, J. and O’Shea, D., Ideals, Varieties, and Algorithms, 2nd edn, Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics (Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg–New York, 1997).Google Scholar
[4]Fernández-Alcober, G. A. and Shumyatsky, P., ‘Positive laws on word values in residually-p groups’, Preprint, 2010.Google Scholar
[5]Gruenberg, K. W., ‘Residual properties of infinite soluble groups’, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 7 (1957), 29–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Huppert, B., Endliche Gruppen I, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, 134 (Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg–New York, 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Olshanskii, A. Yu. and Storozhev, A., ‘A group variety defined by a semigroup law’, J. Aust. Math. Soc. (Series A) 60 (1996), 225–259.Google Scholar
[8]Robinson, D. J. S., A Course in the Theory of Groups, 2nd edn, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 80 (Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg–New York, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar