Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T09:19:53.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Planarity and minimal path algorithms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Alfred B. Manaster
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Clifornia, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, U.S.A.
Jeffrey B. Remmel
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Clifornia, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, U.S.A.
James H. Schmerl
Affiliation:
J.H. Schmerl, Department of Mathematics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06268, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In 1981 two notions of effective presentation of countable connected graphs were formulated by J. C. E. Dekker—namely, edge recognition algorithm graphs and minimal path algorithm graphs. In this paper we show that every planar graph has a minimal path algorithm presentation but that some graphs have no minimal path algorithm presentations. We introduce the notion of a shortest distance algorithm graph, show that it lies strictly between the two notions of Dekker, and show that every graph has a shortest distance algorithm presentation. Finally, in contrast to Dekker's result about minimal path algorithm graphs, we produce a shortest distance algorithm graph which has no spanning tree which is an edge recognition algorithm graph.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1986

References

[1]Dekker, J. C. E., ‘Twilight graphs’, J. Symbolic Logic 46 (1981), 539571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Remmel, J. B., ‘Effective structures not contained in recursively enumerable sructures’, (pp. 206226 in) Aspects of Effective Algebra, Crossley, J., ed. (Upside Down A Book Co., Clayton, Australia, 1979).Google Scholar