Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:10:36.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PARABOLIC CLASSICAL CURVATURE FLOWS

Part of: Parabolic equations and systems Classical differential geometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2017

BRENDAN GUILFOYLE  and
WILHELM KLINGENBERG
BRENDAN GUILFOYLE*
Affiliation:
School of STEM, Institute of Technology, Tralee, Co. Kerry, Ireland email [email protected]
WILHELM KLINGENBERG
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, UK email [email protected]
*
✉[email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We consider classical curvature flows: 1-parameter families of convex embeddings of the 2-sphere into Euclidean 3-space, which evolve by an arbitrary (nonhomogeneous) function of the radii of curvature (RoC). We determine conditions for parabolic flows that ensure the boundedness of various geometric quantities and investigate some examples. As a new tool, we introduce the RoC diagram of a surface and its hyperbolic or anti-de Sitter metric. The relationship between the RoC diagram and the properties of Weingarten surfaces is also discussed.

Keywords

oriented linesradii of curvatureparabolic flowWeingartencurvature flow

MSC classification

Primary: 35K40: Second-order parabolic systems
Secondary: 53A05: Surfaces in Euclidean space
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 104 , Issue 3 , June 2018 , pp. 338 - 357
Copyright
© 2017 Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc. 

References

Andrews, B., ‘Contraction of convex hypersurfaces in Euclidean space’, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 2 (1994), 151–171.Google Scholar
Bloore, F. J., ‘The shape of pebbles’, Math. Geol. 9 (1977), 113–122.Google Scholar
Chern, S. S., ‘Some new characterizations of the Euclidean sphere’, Duke Math. J. 12 (1945), 279–290.Google Scholar
Chern, S. S., ‘On special W-surfaces’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 6 (1955), 783–786.Google Scholar
Chow, B., ‘Deforming convex hypersurfaces by the square root of the scalar curvature’, Invent. Math. 87 (1987), 63–82.Google Scholar
Domokos, G. and Gibbons, G. W., ‘The evolution of pebble size and shape in space and time’, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 468 (2012), 3059–3079.Google Scholar
Firey, W. J., ‘The shape of worn stones’, Mathematika 21 (1974), 1–11.Google Scholar
Gálvez, J. A., Martínez, A. and Milán, F., ‘Linear Weingarten surfaces in ℝ3 ’, Monatsh. Math. 138 (2003), 133–144.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, C., ‘Flow of nonconvex hypersurfaces into spheres’, J. Differential Geom. 32 (1990), 299–314.Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, B. and Klingenberg, W., ‘An indefinite Kähler metric on the space of oriented lines’, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 72 (2005), 497–509.Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, B. and Klingenberg, W., ‘On Weingarten surfaces in Euclidean and Lorentzian 3-space’, Differential Geom. Appl. 28 (2010), 454–468.Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, B. and Klingenberg, W., ‘From global to local: an index bound for umbilic points on smooth convex surfaces’, Preprint, 2012, arXiv:1207.5994.Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, B. and Klingenberg, W., ‘A converging Lagrangian curvature flow in the space of oriented lines’, Kyushu J. Math. 70 (2016), 343–351.Google Scholar
Hartman, P. and Wintner, A., ‘Umbilical points and W-surfaces’, Amer. J. Math. 76 (1954), 502–508.Google Scholar
Hopf, H., ‘Über Flächen mit einer Relation zwischen den Hauptkrümmungen’, Math. Nachr. 4 (1950–1951), 232–249.Google Scholar
Hopf, H., Differential Geometry in the Large, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1000 (Springer, Berlin, 1983).Google Scholar
Huisken, G., ‘Flow by mean-curvature of convex surfaces into spheres’, J. Differential Geom. 20 (1984), 237–266.Google Scholar
Kühnel, W. and Steller, M., ‘On closed Weingarten surfaces’, Monatsh. Math. 146 (2005), 113–126.Google Scholar
Lieberman, G. M., Second Order Parabolic Differential Equations (World Scientific, London, 1996).Google Scholar
Schnürer, O., ‘Surfaces contracting with speed |A|2 ’, J. Differential Geom. 71 (2005), 347–363.Google Scholar
Schulze, F., ‘Evolution of convex hypersurfaces by powers of the mean curvature’, Math. Z. 251 (2005), 721–733.Google Scholar
Smoczyk, K., ‘A representation formula for the inverse harmonic mean curvature flow’, Elem. Math. 60 (2005), 57–65.Google Scholar
Tso, K. S., ‘Deforming a hypersurface by its Gauss–Kronecker curvature’, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 38 (1985), 867–882.Google Scholar
Voss, K., ‘Über geschlossene Weingartensche Flächen’, Math. Ann. 138 (1959), 42–54.Google Scholar