Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:27:49.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Fourier transform of a compact semisimple Lie group

Part of: Lie groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

N. J. Wildberger
N. J. Wildberger
Affiliation:
Department of Pure Mathematics, University of N. S. W.. P. O. Box 1, Kensington N. S. W.2033, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We develop a concrete Fourier transform on a compact Lie group by means of a symbol calculus, or *-product, on each integral co-adjoint orbit. These *-products are constructed by means of a moment map defined for each irreducible representation. We derive integral formulae for these algebra structures and discuss the relationship between two naturally occurring inner products on them. A global Kirillov-type character is obtained for each irreducible representation. The case of SU(2) is treated in some detail, where some interesting connections with classical spherical trigonometry are obtained.

MSC classification

Secondary: 22E46: Semisimple Lie groups and their representations
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , February 1994 , pp. 64 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1994

References

[1]Arnal, D., Cahen, M. and Gutt, S., ‘Representatins of compact Lie groups and quantization by deformation’, Note à paraître à l'Académie des Sciences de Belgique (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Arnal, D. and Cortet, J. C., ‘Nilpotent Fourier transform and applications’, Lett. Math. Phys. 9 (1985), 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Arnal, D. and Ludwig, J., ‘La convexité de l'application moment d'un groupe de Lie’, J. Funct. Anal. 105 (1992), 256–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Figueroa, H., Gracia-Bondía, J. M. and Várilly, J. C., ‘Moyal quantization with compact symmetry groups and noncommutative harmonic analysis’, J. Math. Phys. 31 (1990), 2664–2671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Gutt, S., ‘An explicit *-product on the cotangent bundle of a Lie group’, Lett. Math. Phys. 7 (1983), 249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Helgason, S., Groups and geometric analysis (Academic Press, Orlando, 1984).Google Scholar
[7]Howe, R., Ratcliff, G. and Wildberger, N., ‘Symbol mappings for certain nilpotent groups’, in: Lie Group Representations III, Proceedings U. of Maryland, volume 1077 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984) pp. 288–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Khalgui, M. S., ‘Charactères des groupes de Lie’, J. Funct. Anal. 47 (1982), 64–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Kirillov, A. A., ‘Unitary representations of nilpotent Lie groups’, Russian. Math. Surveys 17 (1962), 53–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Knapp, A. and Speh, B., ‘Status of classification of irreducible unitary representations’, in: Harmonic Analysis Proc., Minneapolis, volume 908 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics (Springer, Berlin, 1982).Google Scholar
[11]Kostant, B., ‘Quantization and unitary representations’, in: Lectures in modern analysis III (ed. Taam, C. T.), volume 170 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics (Springer, Berlin, 1970) pp. 87–208.Google Scholar
[12]Kostant, B., ‘On convexity, the Weyl group and the Iwasawa decomposition’, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 6 (1973), 413–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Lichnerowicz, A., ‘Existence and invariance of twisted products on a symplectic manifold’, Lett. Math. Phys. 5 (1981), 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Moreno, C. and Ortega-Navarro, P., ‘*-products on D'(C), S 2 and related spectral analysis’, Lett. Math. Phys. 7 (1983), 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Sherman, T., ‘Fourier analysis on the sphere’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 209 (1975), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Souriau, J. M., Structure des systèmes dynamiques (Dunod, Paris, 1970).Google Scholar
[17]Todhunter, I., Spherical Trigonometry for the use of colleges and schools (Macmillan, London, 1914).Google Scholar
[18]Varadarajan, V., Lie algebras and their representations (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1974).Google Scholar
[19]Várilly, J. C. and Gracia-Bondía, J. M., ‘The Moyal representation for spin’, Ann. Physics 190 (1989), 107–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Vilenkin, N., Specialfunctions and the theory of group representations (Amer. Math. Society, Providence, 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Vogan, D., ‘The unitary dual of GL(n) over an archimedean field’, Invent. Math. 83 (1986), 449–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Wildberger, N., Quantization and harmonic analysis on nilpotent groups (Ph.D. Thesis, Yale University, 1983).Google Scholar
[23]Wildberger, N., ‘Convexity and unitary representations of nilpotent Lie groups’, Invent. Math. 98 (1989), 281–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Wildberger, N., ‘The moment map of a Lie group representation’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 330 (1992), 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar