Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:43:03.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On products of almost strong liftings

Part of: Classical measure theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

N. D. Macheras  and
W. Strauss
N. D. Macheras
Affiliation:
Department of StatisticsUniversity of Piraeus80 Karaoli and Dimitriou street 185 34 PiraeusGreece e-mail: [email protected]
W. Strauss
Affiliation:
Mathematisches Institut A Universität StuttgartPostfach 80 11 40 D-70511 StuttgartGermany e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Dealing with a problem posed by Kupka we give results concerning the permanence of the almost strong lifting property (respectively of the universal strong lifting property) under finite and countable products of topological probability spaces. As a basis we prove a theorem on the existence of liftings compatible with products for general probability spaces, and in addition we use this theorem for discussing finite products of lifting topologies.

MSC classification

Secondary: 28A51: Lifting theory
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , June 1996 , pp. 311 - 333
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1996

References

[1]Babiker, A. G. A. G., Heller, G. and Strauss, W., ‘On strong lifting compactness, with applications to topological vector spaces’, J. Austral. Math. Soc. (Ser. A) 41 (1986), 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Babiker, A. G. A. G. and Knowles, J. D., ‘Functions and measures on product spaces’, Mathematika 32 (1985), 60–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Babiker, A. G. A. G. and Strauss, W., ‘Almost strong liftings and τ-additivity’, in: Measure theory proc. Oberwolfach 1979 (ed. Kölzow, D.), Lecture Notes in Math. 794 (Springer, Berlin, 1980) pp. 220–227.Google Scholar
[4]Bauer, H., Mass-und Integrationstheorie (de Gruyter, Berlin, 1990).Google Scholar
[5]Bourbaki, N., Elements de mathematique VI, Integration Chap. I-IV (Hermann, Paris, 1952).Google Scholar
[6]Choksi, J. R., ‘Recent developments arising out of Kakutani's work on completion regularity of measures’, Contemp. Math. 96 (1984), 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Dieudonné, J., ‘Sur la theoreme de Lebesgue-Nikodým (III)’, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 23 (1947–1948), 25–53.Google Scholar
[8]Dieudonné, J., ‘On two Theorems of Mokobodzki’, note of 23 June 1977.Google Scholar
[9]Fremlin, D. H., ‘Products of Radon measures: a counter-example’, Canad. Math. Bull. 19 (1976), 285–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Fremlin, D. H., ‘Measure algbras’, in: Handbook of Boolean algebra (ed. Monk, J.) (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1989).Google Scholar
[11]Gillman, L., ‘A P-space and an extremally disconnected space whose product is not an F-space’, Arch. Math. Basel 11 (1960), 53–55.Google Scholar
[12]Graf, S. and von Weizsäcker, H., ‘On the Existence of Lower Densities in Noncomplete Measure Spaces’, in: Measure theory proc. Oberwolfach 1975 (eds. Bellow, A. and Kölzow, D.), Lecture Notes in Math. 541 (Springer, Berlin, 1976), pp. 155–158.Google Scholar
[13]Gryllakis, C. and Koumoullis, G., ‘Completion regularity and τ-additivity of measures on product spaces’, Compositio Math. 73 (1990), 329–344.Google Scholar
[14]Henze, E., Einführung in die Masstheorie (BI, Mannheim-Wien-Zürich, 1971).Google Scholar
q[15] Hewitt, E. and Stromberg, K., Real and abstract analysis (Springer, Berlin, 1965).Google Scholar
[16]Tulcea, A. Ionescu and Tulcea, C. Ionescu, Topics in the theory of lifting (Springer, Berlin, 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Jacobs, K., Measure and integral (Academic Press, New York, 1978).Google Scholar
[18]Johnson, R. A., ‘Products of two Borel measures’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 269 (1982), 611–625.Google Scholar
[19]Johnson, R. A. and Wilczyn'sky, W., ‘Finite products of Borel measures’, unpublished note, Washington State University and University of Lodz.Google Scholar
[20]Kakutani, S., ‘Concrete representation of abstract (L)-spaces and the mean ergodic theorem’, Ann. of Math. 42 (1941), 523–537.Google Scholar
[21]Kellerer, H. G., ‘Baire sets in product spaces’, in: Measure theory proc. Oberwolfach 1979 (ed. Kölzow, D.), Lecture Notes in Math. 794 (Springer, Berlin, 1980) pp. 38–44.Google Scholar
[22]Kupka, J., ‘Strong lifting with applications to measurable cross sections in locally compact groups’, Israel J. Math. 44 (1983), 243–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Macheras, N. D. and Strauss, W., ‘On various strong lifting properties for topological measure spaces’, in: Measure theory proc. Oberwolfach 1990, Supp. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo (2) 28 (1992) pp. 149–162.Google Scholar
[24]Macheras, N. D. and Strauss, W., ‘On strong liftings for projective limits’, Fund. Math. 144 (1994), 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Macheras, N. D. and Strauss, W., ‘On self-consistent families of almost strong liftings in projective limits’, in: Proc. second Greek conf. of math. analysis (Univ. of Athens, Athens, 1992) pp. 202–206.Google Scholar
[26]Macheras, N. D. and Strauss, W., ‘Products and projective limits of almost strong liftings’, submitted.Google Scholar
[27]Ressel, P., ‘Some continuity and measurability results on spaces of measures’, Math. Scand. 40 (1977), 69–78.Google Scholar
[28]Talagrand, M., ‘Closed convex hull of set of measurable functions and measurability of translations’, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 32 (1982), 39–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[29]Talagrand, M., ‘On liftings and regularization of stochastic processes’, Probab. Theor. Relat. Fields 78 (1988), 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[30]Traynor, T., ‘An elementary proof of the lifting theorem’, Pacific J. Math. 53 (1974), 267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar