Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:22:08.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On generalized theta series liftings

Part of: Discontinuous groups and automorphic forms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Min Ho Lee
Min Ho Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics University of Northern IowaCedar Falls Iowa 50614USA e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We generalize dual reductive pairs by using reductive groups that are not necessarily subgroups of symplectic groups and construct the corresponding theta-series liftings for certain types of automorphic forms. We also discuss connections of such generalized theta-series liftings with families of abelian varieties parametrized by an arithmetic variety.

MSC classification

Secondary: 11F27: Theta series; Weil representation; theta correspondences 11F70: Representation-theoretic methods; automorphic representations over local and global fields
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 62 , Issue 2 , April 1997 , pp. 229 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1997

References

[1]Borel, A. and Jacquet, H., ‘Automorhic forms and automorphic representations’, in: Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 33 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1979) pp. 189–202.Google Scholar
[2]Cox, D. and Zucker, S., ‘Intersection numbers of sections of elliptic surfaces’, Invent. Math. 53 (1979), 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Gelbart, S., ‘On theta series liftings for unitary groups’, in: Theta functions from the classical to the modern (ed. Murty, M.) (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1993) pp. 129–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Howe, R., ‘θ-series and invariant theory’, in: Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 33 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1979) pp. 275–286.Google Scholar
[5]Howe, R. and Piatetski-Shapiro, I., ‘Some examples of automorphic forms on Sp 4’, Duke Math. J. 50 (1983), 55–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Hunt, B. and Meyer, W., ‘Mixed automorphic forms and invariants of elliptic surfaces’, Math. Ann. 271 (1985), 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Kuga, M., Fiber varieties over a symmetric space whose fibers are abelian varieties, I, II (Lecture Notes, Univ. Chicago, 1963/1964).Google Scholar
[8]Kuga, M. and Ihara, S., ‘Family of families of abelian varieties’, in: Algebraic number theory (Japan Soc. Prom. Soc., Tokyo, 1977) pp. 129–142.Google Scholar
[9]Lee, M. H., ‘Mixed cusp forms and holomorphic forms on elliptic varieties’, Pacific J. Math. 132 (1988), 363–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Lee, M. H., ‘Conjugates of equivariant holomorphic maps of symmetric domains’, Pacific J. Math. 149 (1991), 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Lee, M. H., ‘Mixed cusp forms and Poincaré series’, Rocky Mountain J. Math. 23 (1993), 1009–1022.Google Scholar
[12]Lee, M. H., ‘Mixed Siegel modular forms and Kuga fiber varieties’, Illinois J. Math. 38 (1994), 692–700.Google Scholar
[13]Lee, M. H., ‘Mixed automorphic vector bundles on Shimura varieties’, Pacific J. Math. 173 (1996), 105–126.Google Scholar
[14]Prasad, D., ‘Weil representation, Howe duality, and the theta correspondence’, in: Theta functions from the classical to the modern (ed. Murty, M.) (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1993) pp. 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Satake, I., Algebraic structures of symmetric domains (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1980).Google Scholar
[16]Stiller, P., Special values of Dirichlet series, monodromy, and the periods of automorphic forms, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 299 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Weil, A., ‘Sur certains groupes d'operateurs unitaires’, Acta Math. 111 (1964), 143–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar