Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T00:49:32.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Fourier transform multipliers in Lp

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

G. O. Okikiolu
Affiliation:
University of East AngliaNorwich, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We denote by R the set of real numbers, and by Rn, n ≧ 2, the Euclidean space of dimension n. Given any subset E of Rn, n ≧ 1, we denote the characteristic function of E by xE, so that XE(x) = 0 if xE; and XE(X) = 0 if xRn/E.The space L(Rn) Lp consists of those measurable functions f on Rn such that is finite. Also, L represents the space of essentially bounded measurable functions with ║f>0; m({x: |f(x)| > x}) = O}, where m represents the Lebesgue measure on Rn The numbers p and p′ will be connected by l/p+ l/p′= 1.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1972

References

[1]Brainerd, B. and Edwards, R. E., ‘Linear operators which commute with translations’, J. Austral. Math. Soc. 6 (1966) 289327, 328–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Hörmander, L., ‘Estimates for translation invariant operators in Lp spaces’, Acta Math. 104 (1960), 93140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]de Leeuw, K., ‘On Lp multipliers’, Ann. of Math. 81 (1965), 364379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Littman, W., ‘Multipliers in Lp and interpolationBull. Amer. Math. Soc., 71 (1965), 764766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Littman, W., McCarthy, C. and Riviere, N., ‘Lp-multiplier theorems’, Studia Math. 30 (1968), 193217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Mihlin, S. G., ‘On the multipliers of Fourier integrals’, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.) 109 (1956), 701703.Google Scholar
[7]Stein, E. M., ‘On limits of sequences of operators’, Ann. of Math. 74 (1961), 140170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Titchmarsh, E. C., Introduction to the theory of Fourier integrals, (Oxford, 1937).Google Scholar
[9]Zygmund, A., Trigonometric Series, Vols. I & II (Cambridge, 1959). Added in proof.Google Scholar
[10]Okikiolu, G. O., ‘On the theory and applications of Dirichlet projections’, J. für die reine angew. Math. 245 (1970), 149164.Google Scholar