Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T02:02:19.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Generalized theorem of Hartman-Grobman on measure chains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Stefan Hilger
Affiliation:
Mathematisch-Geographische FakultättKatholische Universität EichstättD-85071 EichstätGermany e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We will prove the Theorem of Hartman-Grobman in a very general form. It states the topological equivalence of the flow of a nonlinear non-autonomous differential or difference equation with critical component to the flow of a partially linearized equation. The critical spectrum has not necessearily to be contained in the imaginary axis or the unit circle respectively. Further on we will employ the socalled calculus on measure chains within dynamical systems theory. Within this calculus the usual one dimensional time scales can be replaced by measure chains which are essentially closed subsets of R. The paper can be understood without knowledge of this calculus.

So our main theorem will be valid even for equations defined on very strange time scales such as sequences of closed intervals. This is especially interesting for applications within the theory of differential-difference equations or within numerical analysis of qualitative phenomena of dynamical systems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1996

References

[1]Aulbach, B., ‘Hierarchies of invariant mainfolds’, J. Nigerian Math. Soc. 6 (1987), 7189.Google Scholar
[2]Aulbach, B. and Hilger, S., ‘Linear dynamic processes with inhomogeneous time scales’, in: Nonlinear dynamics and quantum dynamical systems (Akademic, Berlin, 1990).Google Scholar
[3]Beyn, W.-J., ‘On the numerical approximation of phase portraits near stationary points’, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 24, (1987), 10951113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Bayn, W.-J. and Lorenz, J., ‘Center mainfoles of dynamical systems under discretization’, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 9 (1987), 381414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Gantmacher, F. R., Matrizentheorie (VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Henry, D., Invariant mainfolds (Lecture Notes, Dept. Nat. Aplicada, Universidad de Sao Paulo, 1983).Google Scholar
[7]Hilger, S., Ein MaΒkettenkalkül mit Anwendung auf Zentrumsmannigfaltigkeiten (Doctoral Dissertation, Univ. Würzburg, 1988).Google Scholar
[8]Hilger, S., ‘Analysis on measure chains— A unified approach to continuous and discrete calculus’, Resultate Math. 18 (1990), 1856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Hilger, S., ‘Smoothness of invariant manifolds’, J. Funct. Anal. 106 (1992), 95129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Kelley, A., ‘The stable, center, center-unstable, unstable, manifolds’, J. Differential Equations 3 (1967), 546570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Kirchgraber, U., ‘The gemoetry in the neighborhood of an invariant mainfold and topological conjugacy’, Research Report 83–01, Sem. Ang. Math., ETH Zürich (1983).Google Scholar
[12]Kirchgraber, U. and Plamer, K. J., Geometry in the neighborhood of invariant manifolds of maps and flows and linearization (Pitman, London, 1991).Google Scholar
[13]Kloeden, P. E. and Lorenz, J., ‘Stable attracting sets in dynamical systems and their one-step discretization’, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 23 (1986), 986995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Palmer, K. J., ‘Qualitative behavior of a system of ODE near an equilibrium point–a generalization of the Hartman-Grobman-Theorem’, Preprint 372, Inst. Ang. Math., Univ. Bonn, 1980.Google Scholar
[15]Vanderbauwhede, A. and Van Gils, S. A., ‘Center mainfolds and contractions on a scale of Banach spaces’, J. Funct. Anal. 72 (1987), 209224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar