Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:35:01.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fixed points of quasi-nonexpansive mappings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

W. G. Dotson Jr
W. G. Dotson Jr
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University at RaleighRaleigh, North Carolina.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A self-mapping T of a subset C of a normed linear space is said to be non-expansive provided ║Tx — Ty║ ≦ ║x – y║ holds for all x, y ∈ C. There has been a number of recent results on common fixed points of commutative families of nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces, for example see DeMarr [6], Browder [3], and Belluce and Kirk [1], [2]. There have also been several recent results concerning common fixed points of two commuting mappings, one of which satisfies some condition like nonexpansiveness while the other is only continuous, for example see DeMarr [5], Jungck [8], Singh [11], [12], and Cano [4]. These results, with the exception of Cano's, have been confined to mappings from the reals to the reals. Some recent results on common fixed points of commuting analytic mappings in the complex plane have also been obtained, for example see Singh [13] and Shields [10].

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , March 1972 , pp. 167 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1972

References

[1]Belluce, L. P. and Kirk, W. A., ‘Fixed-point theorems for families of contraction mappings’, Pacific J. Math. 18 (1966), 213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Belluce, L. P. and Kirk, W. A., ‘Nonexpansive mappings and fixed-points in Banach spaces’, Illinois J. Math. 11 (1967), 474–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Browder, F. E., ‘Nonexpansive nonlinear operators in a Banach space’, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 54 (1965), 1041–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Cano, J., ‘On commuting mappings by successive approximations’, Amer. Math. Monthly 75 (1968), 393–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]DeMarr, R., ‘A common fixed point theorem for commuting mappings’, Amer. Math. Monthly 70 (1963), 535–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]DeMarr, R., ‘Common fixed points for commuting contraction mappings’, Pacific J. Math. 13 (1963), 1139–1141.Google Scholar
[7]Diaz, J. B. and Metcalf, F. T., ‘On the structure of the set of subsequential limit points of successive approximations’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73 (1967), 516–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Jungck, G., ‘Commuting mappings and common fixed points’, Amer. Math. Monthly 73 (1966), 735–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Kirk, W. A., ‘A fixed point theorem for mappings which do not increase distances’, Amer. Math. Monthly 72 (1965), 1004–1006.Google Scholar
[10]Shields, A. L., ‘On fixed points of commuting analytic functions’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 15 (1964), 703–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Singh, K. L., ‘On fixed point theorem’, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 15 (1968), 149–150.Google Scholar
[12]Singh, K. L., ‘Commuting functions and common fixed points’, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 15 (1968), 239.Google Scholar
[13]Singh, S. P., ‘On commuting analytic functions with fixed points’, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 14 (1967), 673.Google Scholar