Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:02:48.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elementary amenable groups and 4-manifolds with Euler characteristic 0

Part of: Low-dimensional topology Topological manifolds Special aspects of infinite or finite groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Jonathan A. Hillman
Jonathan A. Hillman
Affiliation:
University of Sydney Sydney, N.S.W. 2006, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We extend earlier work relating asphericity and Euler characteristics for finite complexes whose fundamental groups have nontrivial torsion free abelian normal subgroups. In particular a finitely presentable group which has a nontrivial elementary amenable subgroup whose finite subgroups have bounded order and with no nontrivial finite normal subgroup must have deficiency at most 1, and if it has a presentation of deficiency 1 then the corresponding 2-complex is aspherical. Similarly if the fundamental group of a closed 4-manifold with Euler characteristic 0 is virtually torsion free and elementary amenable then it either has 2 ends or is virtually an extension of Z by a subgroup of Q, or the manifold is asphencal and the group is virtually poly- Z of Hirsch length 4.

Keywords

asphericitydeficiencyelementary amenable groupEuler characteristic4-manifold

MSC classification

Secondary: 57N13: Topology of $E^4$, $4$-manifolds 57M20: Two-dimensional complexes 20F99: None of the above, but in this section
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , February 1991 , pp. 160 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1991

References

[1]Bieri, R. and Strebel, R., ‘Almost finitely presented soluble groups’, Comment. Math. Helv. 53 (1978), 258–278.Google Scholar
[2]Casson, A. and Freedman, M. H., ‘Atomic surgery problems’, in Four-Manifold Theory, edited by Gordon, C. McA. and Kirby, R. C., (Contemp. Math. 35, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R. I., 1984).Google Scholar
[3]Cheeger, J. and Gromov, M., ‘L 2-cohomology and group cohomology’, Topology 25 (1986), 189–215.Google Scholar
[4]Chou, C., ‘Elementary amenable groups’, Illinois J. Math. 24 (1980), 396–407.Google Scholar
[5]Cohen, J. M., ‘Von Neumann dimension and the homology of covering spaces’, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. 30 (1979), 133–142.Google Scholar
[6]Dyer, M. N., ‘Localization of group rings and applications to 2-complexes’, Comment. Math. Helv. 62 (1987), 1–17.Google Scholar
[7]Eckmann, B., ‘Nilpotent group actions and Euler characteristic’, in Algebraic Topology, Barcelona 1986, edited by Aguadé, J. and Kane, R., pp. 120–123 (Lecture Notes in Math. 1298, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1987.Google Scholar
[8]Fornera, L., ‘Normal abelian subgroups and Euler characteristics’, J. Appl. Algebra 60 (1989), 237–243.Google Scholar
[9]Freedman, M. H., ‘The disk theorem for four-dimensional manifolds’, in Proceedings of the Internat Congress of Mathematicians, vol. 1, Warsaw, 1983, pp. 647–663.Google Scholar
[10]Goodearl, K. R., ‘Localized group rings, the invariant basis property and Euler characteristics’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 91 (1984), 523–528.Google Scholar
[11]Gottlieb, D. H., ‘A certain subgroup of the fundamental group’, Amer. J.Math. 87 (1965), 840–856.Google Scholar
[12]Grigorchuk, R., ‘Degrees of growth of finitely generated groups and the theory of invariant means’, Math. USSR-Izv. 25 (1985), 259–300.Google Scholar
[13]Hillman, J. A., ‘Orientabiity, asphericity and two-knots’, Houston J. Math. 6 (1980), 67–76.Google Scholar
[14]Hillman, J. A., ‘Aspherical four-manifolds and the centres of 2-knot groups’, Comment. Math. Helv. 56 (1981), 465–471.Google Scholar
[15]Hillman, J. A., 2-knots and their groups, (Austral. Math. Soc. Lecture Series 5, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, 1989).Google Scholar
[16]Kaplanslcy, I., Fields and rings, (Chicago Lectures in Math., Chicago Univ. Press, Chicago, London, 1969).Google Scholar
[17]Kropholler, P. H., Letter to Hillman, J. A. (31 03 1987).Google Scholar
[18]Kropholler, P. H., Linnell, P. A. and Moody, J. A., ‘Applications of a new K-theoretic theorem to soluble group rings’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 104 (1988), 675–684.Google Scholar
[19]Linnell, P. A., ‘Zero divisors and group von Neumann algebras’, Pacific J. Math., to appear.Google Scholar
[20]Ol'shanskii, O., ‘On the problem of the existence of an invariant mean on a group’, Russian Math. Surveys 35:4 (1980), 180–181.Google Scholar
[21]Pier, J.-P., Amenable locally compact groups, (John Wiley, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
[22]Robinson, D. J. S., ‘On the cohomology of soluble groups of finite rank’, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 6 (1975), 155–164.Google Scholar
[23]Rosset, S., ‘A vanishing theorem for Euler characteristics’, Math. Z. 185 (1984), 211–215.Google Scholar
[24]Smith, M. K., ‘Central zero divisors in group algebras’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 91 (1984), 529–531.Google Scholar
[25]Hillman, J. A. and Linnell, P. A., ‘Elementary amenable groups of finite Hirsch length are locally-finite by virtually-solvable’, J. Austral. Math. Soc., to appear.Google Scholar