Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-vmclg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-23T03:33:35.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The divisor problem for (k, r) — integers1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

M. V. Subbarao  and
D. Suryanarayana
M. V. Subbarao
Affiliation:
Department of MathematicsUniversity of AlbertaEdmonton, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let k and r be fixed integers such that 1 < r < k. It is well-known that a positive integer is called r-free if it is not divisible by the r-th power of any integer > 1. We call a positive integer n, a (k, r)-integer, if n is of the form n = a kb, where a is a positive integer and b is a r-free integer. In the limiting case, when k becomes infinite, a (k, r)-integer becomes a r-free integer and so one might consider the (k, i) integers as generalized r-free integers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , June 1973 , pp. 430 - 440
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1973

References

[1]Hardy, G. H. and Wright, E. M., An introduction to the theory of numbers Fourth edition, (Oxford, 1965).Google Scholar
[2]Kolesnik, G. A., ‘An improvement of the remainder term in the divisor problem’, Mat. Zametki 6 (1969), 545–554 = Mathematical Notes of Sciences of the USSR 6 (1969), 784–791.Google Scholar
[3]Subbarao, M. V. and Suryanarayana, D., ‘On the order of the error function of the (k, r)-integers’, J. Number theory (to appear).Google Scholar
[4]Suryanarayana, D. and Prasad, V. Siva Rama, ‘The number of k-free divisors of an integer’, Acta Arithmetica, 17 (1971), 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Titchmarsh, E. C., The Theory of the Riemann Zeta function (Oxford, 1951.)Google Scholar
[6]Walfisz, A., Weylsche Exponentialsummen in der neueran Zahlentheorie (Berlin, 1963).Google Scholar