Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:55:52.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

COHOMOLOGY OF THE PINWHEEL TILING

Part of: Homology and cohomology theories Topological dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2014

DIRK FRETTLÖH ,
BENJAMIN WHITEHEAD  and
MICHAEL F. WHITTAKER
DIRK FRETTLÖH
Affiliation:
Faculty of Technology, Universität Bielefeld, Postfach 100131, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany email [email protected]
BENJAMIN WHITEHEAD
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Applied Statistics, University of Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia email [email protected]
MICHAEL F. WHITTAKER*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Applied Statistics, University of Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia email [email protected]
*
✉[email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We provide a computation of the Čech cohomology of the pinwheel tiling using the Anderson–Putnam complex. A border-forcing version of the pinwheel tiling is produced that allows an explicit construction of the complex for the quotient of the continuous hull by the circle. The cohomology of the continuous hull is given using a spectral sequence argument of Barge, Diamond, Hunton and Sadun.

Keywords

Čech cohomologypinwheel tilingaperiodic substitution tilingborder-forcing

MSC classification

Secondary: 37B50: Multi-dimensional shifts of finite type, tiling dynamics 55N05: Čech types
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 97 , Issue 2 , October 2014 , pp. 162 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc. 

References

Anderson, J. and Putnam, I. F., ‘Topological invariants for substitution tilings and their C ∗-algebras’, Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 18 (1998), 509–537.Google Scholar
Baake, M., Frettlöh, D. and Grimm, U., ‘A radial analogue of Poisson’s summation formula with application to powder diffraction and pinwheel patterns’, J. Geom. Phys. 57 (2007), 1331–1343.Google Scholar
Barge, M. and Diamond, B., ‘Cohomology in one-dimensional substitution tiling spaces’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 136 (2008), 2183–2191.Google Scholar
Barge, M., Diamond, B., Hunton, J. and Sadun, L., ‘Cohomology of substitution tiling spaces’, Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 30 (2010), 1607–1627.Google Scholar
Benedetti, R. and Gambaudo, J. M., ‘On the dynamics of G-solenoids: application to Delone sets’, Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 23 (2003), 673–691.Google Scholar
Bott, R. and Tu, L. W., Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Springer, New York, 1982).Google Scholar
Kellendonk, J., ‘Noncommutative geometry of tilings and gap labelling’, Rev. Math. Phys. 7 (1995), 1133–1180.Google Scholar
Kellendonk, J. and Putnam, I. F., ‘Tilings, C ∗-algebras, and K-theory’, in: Directions in Mathematical Quasicrystals, CRM Monograph Series, 13 (eds. Baake, M. and Moody, R. V.) (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2000), 177–206.Google Scholar
Ormes, N., Radin, C. and Sadun, L., ‘A homeomorphism invariant for substitution tiling spaces’, Geom. Dedicata 90 (2002), 153–182.Google Scholar
Radin, C., ‘The pinwheel tilings of the plane’, Ann. of Math. (2) 139 (1994), 661–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadun, L., ‘Tiling spaces are inverse limits’, J. Math. Phys. 44 (2003), 5410–5414.Google Scholar
Sadun, L., Topology of Tiling Spaces, University Lecture Series, 46 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomyak, B., ‘Dynamics of self-similar tilings’, Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 17 (1997), 695–738.Google Scholar
Whittaker, M., ‘C ∗-algebras of tilings with infinite rotational symmetry’, J. Operator Theory 64 (2010), 299–319.Google Scholar