Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:59:27.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Automorphisms of permutational wreath products

Part of: Special aspects of infinite or finite groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

A. Mohammadi Hassanabadi
A. Mohammadi Hassanabadi
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics Faculty of Science The University of IsfahanIsfahan, Iran
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Ore (1942) studied the automorphisms of finite monomial groups and Holmes (1956, pp. 23–93) has given the form of the automorphisms of the restricted monomial groups in the infinite case. The automorphism group of a standard wreath product has been studied by Houghton (1962) and Segal (1973, Chapter 4). Monomial groups and standard wreath products are both special cases of permutational wreath product. Here we investigate the automorphisms of the permutational wreath product and consider to what extent the results holding in the special cases remain true for the general construction. Our results extend those of Bunt (1968).

MSC classification

Secondary: 20F55: Reflection and Coxeter groups
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , September 1978 , pp. 198 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1978

References

Бyht, A. Я. [Bunt, A. Ja.] (1968), “O яруппэ абтоморφизмоб обобшэнного сллэтэния” [On the automorphism group of the generalised wreath product], Latvii. Matm. Ezegodnik[Latvian Math. Yearbook], 81–88 (Izdat. “Zinatne“, Riga).Google Scholar
Cohen, Daniel E. (1972), Groups of Cohomological Dimension One (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 245, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouch, Ralph B. (1955), “Monomial groups”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 80, 187–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, C. V. (1956), “Contribution to the theory of groups”, Research Grant NSF-G1126, Report No. 5.Google Scholar
Houghton, C. H. (1962), “On the automorphism groups of certain wreath products”, Publ. Math. Debrecen 9, 307–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, C. H. (1972), “Ends of gruops and the associated first cohomology groups”, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 6 (81–92).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, C. H. (1973), “Ends of groups and baseless subgroups of wreath products”, Compositio Math. 27, 205–211.Google Scholar
Houghton, C. H. (1974), “Ends of locally compact groups and their coset spaces’, J. Austral. Math. Soc. 17, 274–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, C. H. (1975), Wrreath products of groupoids”, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 10 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassanabadi, A. Mohammadi (1976), PhD thisis, University of Wales.Google Scholar
Neumann, Peter M. (1964), “On the structure of standard wreath products of groups”, Math. Z. 84, 343–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ore, Oystein (1942), “Theory of monomoal groups”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 51, 15–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W. R. (1964), Group theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New jersey).Google Scholar
Segal, D. (1973), PhD Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Specker, Ernst (1949), “Die erste Cohologiegruppen von Überlagerungen und Homotopie-Eigenschaften dreidimensionaler Mannigfaltigkeiten”, Comment. Math. Helv. 23, 303–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wielandt, Helmut (1959/1960), “Unendliche Permutationsgruppen”, Mimeographed Lecture Notes, Univeraität Tübingen.Google Scholar