We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
University of Applied Sciences, Freundallee 15, D-30173Hanover, Germany e-mail: [email protected]
NICLAS TECHNAU*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UKTechnische Universität Graz, Institut für Analysis und Zahlentheorie, Steyrergasse 30/II, A-8010Graz, Austria e-mail: [email protected]
As a consequence of Nesterenko’s proof of the algebraic independence of the three Ramanujan functions $R(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}),Q(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}),$ and $P(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C})$ for any algebraic number $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}$ with $0<\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}<1$, the algebraic independence or dependence of various sets of these numbers is already known for positive even integers $s$. In this paper, we investigate linear forms in the above zeta functions and determine the dimension of linear spaces spanned by such linear forms. In particular, it is established that for any positive integer $m$ the solutions of
with $t_{s},u_{s},v_{s},w_{s}\in \mathbb{Q}$$(1\leq s\leq m)$ form a $\mathbb{Q}$-vector space of dimension $m$. This proves a conjecture from the Ph.D. thesis of Stein, who, in 2012, was inspired by the relation $-2\unicode[STIX]{x1D701}_{F}(2)+\unicode[STIX]{x1D701}_{F}^{\ast }(2)+5\unicode[STIX]{x1D701}_{L}^{\ast }(2)=0$. All the results are also true for zeta functions in $2s$, where the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers are replaced by numbers from sequences satisfying a second-order recurrence formula.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Footnotes
Communicated by M. Coons
References
[1]
André-Jeannin, R., ‘Irrationalité de la somme des inverses de certaines suites récurrentes’, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math.308 (1989), 539–541.Google Scholar
[2]
Borwein, J. M. and Borwein, P. B., Pi and the AGM: A Study in Analytic Number Theory and Computational Complexity, Canadian Mathematical Society Series of Monographs and Advanced Texts, 4 (Wiley, New York, 1987).Google Scholar
[3]
Byrd, P. F. and Friedman, M. D., Handbook of Elliptic Integrals for Engineers and Physicists, 2nd edn (Springer, Berlin, 1971).Google Scholar
[4]
Duverney, D., Nishioka, Ke., Nishioka, Ku. and Shiokawa, I., ‘Transcendence of Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction and reciprocal sums of Fibonacci numbers’, Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci.73 (1997), 140–142.Google Scholar
[5]
Elsner, C., Shimomura, S. and Shiokawa, I., ‘Algebraic relations for reciprocal sums of Fibonacci numbers’, Acta Arith.130(1) (2007), 37–60.Google Scholar
[6]
Elsner, C., Shimomura, S. and Shiokawa, I., ‘Exceptional algebraic relations for reciprocal sums of Fibonacci and Lucas numbers’, in: Diophantine Analysis and Related Fields 2011, AIP Conf. Proc., 1385 (eds. Amou, M. and Katsurada, M.) (AIP, New York, 2011), 17–31.Google Scholar
[7]
Elsner, C., Shimomura, S. and Shiokawa, I., ‘Algebraic independence results for reciprocal sums of Fibonacci numbers’, Acta Arith.148(3) (2011), 205–223.Google Scholar
[8]
Nesterenko, Yu. V., ‘Modular functions and transcendence questions’, Mat. Sb.187 (1996), 65–96; English transl. Sb. Math. 187 (1996), 1319–1348.Google Scholar