Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 April 2009
On page 354 of James (1975) (in the proof of Theorem 5.3(b)) there appear the following two sentences:
‘When n≥7, replacewe may suppose δ=0.’
Unfortunately, the second sentence does not follow from the first. In fact, the first sentence also forces us to replace remains unaltered. Thus the case δ=1 is omitted in the paper.