Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:06:08.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Depicting Properties’ Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2021

JOHN KULVICKI
JOHN KULVICKI*
Affiliation:
DARTMOUTH [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Little has been said about whether pictures can depict properties of properties. This article argues that they do. As a result, resemblance theories of depiction must be changed to accommodate this phenomenon. In addition, diagrams and maps are standardly understood to represent properties of properties, so this article brings accounts of depiction closer to accounts of diagrams than they had been before. Finally, the article suggests that recent work on perceptual content gives us reason to believe we can perceive properties of properties.

Keywords

depictionpicturediagramhigher-order propertyperception
Type
Article
Information
Journal of the American Philosophical Association , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , Fall 2021 , pp. 312 - 328
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © American Philosophical Association 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I thank two anonymous reviewers for very helpful comments.

References

Abell, Catharine. (2009) ‘Canny Resemblance’. Philosophical Review, 118, 183–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abell, Catharine. (2010) ‘Cinema as a Representational Art’. British Journal of Aesthetics, 50, 273–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, David M. (1978) A Theory of Universals. Vol. 2 of Universals and Scientific Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barwise, Jon, and Etchemendy, John. (1995) ‘Heterogeneous Logic’. In Allwein, Gerard and Barwise, Jon (eds.), Logical Reasoning with Diagrams (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 179–200.Google Scholar
Beck, Jacob. (2015) ‘Analogue Magnitude Representations: A Philosophical Primer’. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66, 829–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benovsky, Jiri. (2012) ‘Photographic Representation and the Depiction of Temporal Extension’. Inquiry, 55, 194–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, Gustav. (1968) Meaning and Existence. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Block, Ned. ed. (1981) Imagery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Blumson, Ben. (2009) ‘Defining Depiction’. British Journal of Aesthetics, 49, 143–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumson, Ben. (2014) Resemblance and Representation: An Essay on the Philosophy of Pictures. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.Google Scholar
Budd, Malcolm. (1992) ‘On Looking at a Picture’. In Hopkins, James and Saville, Anthony (eds.), Psychoanalysis, Mind, and Art: Perspectives on Richard Wollheim (London: Blackwell), 259–80.Google Scholar
Budd, Malcolm. (1993) ‘The Look of a Picture’. In Knowles, Dudley, Skorupski, John, and Schier, Flint (eds.), Virtue and Taste: Essays on Politics, Ethics, and Aesthetics (London: Blackwell), 154–175.Google Scholar
Camp, Elisabeth. (2007) ‘Thinking with Maps’. Philosophical Perspectives, 21, 145–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camp, Elisabeth. (2018) ‘Why Maps Are not Propositional’. In Grzankowski, Alex and Montague, Michelle (eds.), Non-propositional Intentionality (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 19–45.Google Scholar
Casati, Roberto, and Varzi, Achille C.. (1999) Parts and Places: The Structures of Spatial Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crane, Tim, ed. (1992) The Contents of Experience: Essays on Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Gregory. (1995) Image and Mind: Film, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, Andy. (2004) ‘Second-Order Predication and the Metaphysics of Properties’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 82, 48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. (2008) LOT 2: The Language of Thought Revisited. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friday, Jonathan. (1996) ‘Transparency and the Photographic Image’. British Journal of Aesthetics, 36, 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. (1951) The Structure of Appearance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. (1976) Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Gabriel. (2013) ‘Beyond Resemblance’. Philosophical Review, 122, 215–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzankowski, Alex, and Montague, Michelle, eds. (2018) Non-propositional Intentionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gunther, York H., ed. (2003) Essays on Nonconceptual Content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugeland, John. (1998) Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heck, Richard. (2007) ‘Are There Different Kinds of Content?’ In McLaughlin, Brian and Cohen, Jonathan (eds.), Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Mind (Malden: Blackwell), 117–38.Google Scholar
Hilbert, David R. (1987) Color and Color Perception: A Study in Anthropocentric Realism. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Robert. (1995) ‘Explaining Depiction’. Philosophical Review, 104, 425–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Robert. (1998) Picture, Image, and Experience: A Philosophical Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, John. (2006) The Objective Eye: Color, Form, and Reality in the Theory of Art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Frank. (1977) ‘Statements about Universals’. Mind, 86, 427–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulvicki, John V. (2006) On Images: Their Structure and Content. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulvicki, John V. (2014) Images. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kulvicki, John V. (2015a) ‘Analog Representation and the Parts Principle’. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6, 165–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulvicki, John V. (2015b) ‘Maps, Pictures, and Predication’. Ergo, 2, 149–74.Google Scholar
Kulvicki, John V. (2016) ‘Timeless Traces of Temporal Patterns’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 74, 335–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkin, Jill H., and Simon, Herbert A.. (1987) ‘Why a Diagram Is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words’. Cognitive Science, 11, 65–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Poidevin, Robin. (2007) The Images of Time: An Essay on Temporal Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. (1986) On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lopes, Dominic. (1996) Understanding Pictures. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Neander, Karen. (1987) ‘Pictorial Representation: A Matter of Resemblance’. British Journal of Aesthetics, 27, 213–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newall, Michael. (2011) What is a Picture? Depiction, Realism, Abstraction. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panofsky, Erwin. (1955) Meaning in the Visual Arts. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Prinz, Jesse. (2006) ‘Beyond Appearances: The Content of Sensation and Perception’. In Gendler, Tamar Szabó and Hawthorne, John (eds.), Perceptual Experience (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 434–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quilty-Dunn, Jake. (2019) ‘Is Iconic Memory Iconic?’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 101, 660–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescorla, Michael. (2009) ‘Cognitive Maps and the Language of Thought’. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60, 377–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartwell, Crispin. (1991) ‘Natural Generativity and Imitation’. British Journal of Aesthetics, 31, 58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schier, Flint. (1986) Deeper into Pictures: An Essay on Pictorial Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, Roger N., and Chipman, Susan. (1970) ‘Second-Order Isomorphism of Internal Representations: Shapes of States’. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Susanna. (2006) ‘Which Properties are Represented in Perception?’ In Gendler, Tamar Szabó and Hawthorne, John (eds.), Perceptual Experience (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 481–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Susanna. (2011) The Contents of Visual Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, Elliot. (1976) ‘Mental Representations’. Synthese, 33, 101–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenning, Keith. (2002) Seeing Reason: Image and Language in Learning to Think. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swoyer, Chris. (1991) ‘Structural Representation and Surrogative Reasoning’. Synthese, 87, 449–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tye, Michael. (1991) The Imagery Debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Walton, Kendall L. (1990) Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, Kendall L. (2008) ‘Experiencing Still Photographs: What Do You See and How Long Do You See It?’ In Walton, Marvelous Images: On Values and the Arts (New York: Oxford University Press), 157–92.Google Scholar
Warburton, Nigel. (1988) ‘Seeing through “Seeing through Photographs”’. Ratio, 1, 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollheim, Richard. (1980) Art and Its Objects. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Nick, and Calabi, Clotilde. (2018) ‘Can Movement Be Depicted?’ Phenomenology and Mind, 14, 170–79.Google Scholar