Hostname: page-component-599cfd5f84-wh4qq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T05:26:15.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Against Irrationalism in the Theory of Propaganda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2022

MEGAN HYSKA Open the ORCID record for MEGAN HYSKA [Opens in a new window]
MEGAN HYSKA*
Affiliation:
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to many accounts, propaganda is a variety of politically significant signal with a distinctive connection to irrationality. This irrationality may be theoretical, or practical; it may be supposed that propaganda characteristically elicits this irrationality anew, or else that it exploits its prior existence. The view that encompasses such accounts we will call irrationalism. This essay presents two classes of propaganda that do not bear the sort of connection to irrationality posited by the irrationalist: hard propaganda and propaganda by the deed. Faced with these counterexamples, some irrationalists will offer their account of propaganda as a refinement of the folk concept rather than as an attempt to capture all of its applications. The author argues that any refinement of the concept of propaganda must allow the concept to remain essentially political, and that the irrationalist refinement fails to meet this condition.

Keywords

propagandarationalityauthoritarianismanarchismH. P. Grice
Type
Article
Information
Journal of the American Philosophical Association , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 2023 , pp. 303 - 317
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Philosophical Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This essay has greatly benefited from the feedback of many people, including Cory Wimberly, Jennifer Lackey, Aidan Gray, Rachel Goodman, David Hilbert, and others in the colloquium audience at the University of Illinois Chicago philosophy department, where I was fortunate to present an early draft. I am also grateful to the participants at the 2021 Workshop on Propaganda and Legitimate Political Persuasion, and particularly to the workshop's organizers, Gloria Origgi and Amelia Godber.

References

Arendt, Hannah. [1951] (1994). The Origins of Totalitarianism. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Baron, Marcia. (2003) ‘Manipulativeness’. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 77, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brousse, Paul. [1877] (2004). ‘Propaganda by the Deed’. In Graham, Robert (ed.), Anarchism: A Documentary History of Libertarian Idea, vol. 1, From Anarchy to Anarchism (300 CE to 1939) (Montreal: Black Rose Books), 150–51.Google Scholar
Cahm, Caroline. (1989) Kropotkin and the Rise of Revolutionary Anarchism, 1872–1886. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cave, Eric M. (2007) ‘What's Wrong with Motive Manipulation?’ Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 10, 129–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, Jesse S. (2005) Anarchism and the Crisis of Representation: Hermeneutics, Aesthetics, Politics. Selinsgrove: Susquehanna University Press.Google Scholar
Colson, Dan. (2017) ‘Propaganda and the Deed: Anarchism, Violence and the Representational Impulse’. American Studies, 55/56, 163–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorst, Kevin. (2020) ‘The Rational Question’. Oxonian Review (blog), March 12, 2020. https://www.oxonianreview.com/authors/kevin-dorst.Google Scholar
Ellul, Jacques. (1973) Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Gorin, Moti. (2014) ‘Do Manipulators Always Threaten Rationality?’ American Philosophical Quarterly, 51, 51–61.Google Scholar
Greenspan, Patricia. (2003) ‘The Problem with Manipulation’. American Philosophical Quarterly, 40, 155–64.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1957) ‘Meaning’. Philosophical Review, 66, 377–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillaume, James. (1910) L'Internationale: Documents et souvenirs (1864–1878), vol. 4. Paris: Tresse et Stocke.Google Scholar
Haslanger, Sally. (2012) ‘Social Construction: The “Debunking” Project’. In Haslanger, Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 113–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Edward S., and Chomsky, Noam. (2011) Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Knopf Doubleday.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max, and Adorno, Theodor W.. (2002) ‘The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception’. In Noerr, Gunzelin Schmid (ed.), Jephcott, Edmund (trans.), Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments (Redwood City: Stanford University Press), 94–136.Google Scholar
Huang, Haifeng. (2015) ‘Propaganda as Signaling’. Comparative Politics, 47, 419–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Haifeng. (2018) ‘The Pathology of Hard Propaganda’. Journal of Politics, 80, 1034–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyska, Megan. (2018) ‘Of Martyrs and Robots: Propaganda and Group Identity’. Yale Review, 106, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyska, Megan. (2021) ‘Propaganda, Irrationality, and Group Agency’. In Hannon, Michael and de Ridder, Jeroen (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology (Abingdon: Routledge), 226–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Thomas. (2008) ‘Disagreement, Dogmatism, and Belief Polarization’. Journal of Philosophy, 105, 611–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert. (1964) One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Marlin, Randal. (2002) Propaganda and the Ethics of Persuasion. Peterborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich. [1932] (1972). The German Ideology. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
May, Todd. (1994) The Political Philosophy of Poststructuralist Anarchism. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Neale, Stephen. (1992) ‘Paul Grice and the Philosophy of Language’. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15, 509–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Michael, and Stewart, Rush T.. (2021) ‘Persistent Disagreement and Polarization in a Bayesian Setting’. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 72, 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. (1986) ‘Logic and Metaphysic in Some Earlier Works of Aristotle’. In Nussbaum, Martha (ed.), Logic, Science, and Dialectic: Collected Papers in Greek Philosophy (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), 180–99.Google Scholar
Pallavicini, Josefina, Hallsson, Bjørn, and Kappel, Klemens. (2021). ‘Polarization in Groups of Bayesian Agents’. Synthese, 198, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quaranto, Anne and Stanley, Jason. (2021) ‘Propaganda’. In Khoo, Justin and Sterken, Rachel (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Social and Political Philosophy of Language (Abingdon: Routledge), 125–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1951) ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’. Philosophical Review, 60, 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard. (1989) Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Sheryl Tuttle. (2002) ‘Understanding Propaganda: The Epistemic Merit Model and Its Application to Art’. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 36, 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Daniel J., Bramson, Aaron, Grim, Patrick, Holman, Bennett, Jung, Jiin, Kovaka, Karen, Ranginani, Anika, and Berger, William J.. (2019) ‘Rational Social and Political Polarization’. Philosophical Studies, 176, 2243–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Wilson, Deirdre. (2015) ‘Beyond Speaker's Meaning’. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 15, 117–49.Google Scholar
Stanley, Jason. (2015) How Propaganda Works. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Táíwò, Olúfémi O. (2018) ‘The Empire Has no Clothes’. Disputatio, 10, 305–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedeen, Lisa. (1999) Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wimberly, Cory. (2017) ‘The Job of Creating Desire: Propaganda as an Apparatus of Government and Subjectification’. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 31(1), 101–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimberly, Cory. (2020) How Propaganda Became Public Relations: Foucault and the Corporate Government of the Public. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. (2003) Political Responsibility and Structural Injustice. Lindley Lecture. Lawrence: Department of Philosophy, University of Kansas.Google Scholar