Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:06:46.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Error in Temporal Error Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2018

JONATHAN TALLANT
JONATHAN TALLANT*
Affiliation:
UNIVERSITY OF [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Within the philosophy of time there has been a growing interest in positions that deny the reality of time. Those positions, whether motivated by arguments from physics or metaphysics, have a shared conclusion: time is not real. What has not been made clear, however, is exactly what it entails to deny the reality of time. Time is unreal, sure. But what does that mean?

There has (within the recent literature) been only one sustained attempt to spell out what it would mean to endorse a (so-called) temporal error theory, a theory that denies the reality of time: Baron and Miller's (2015) ‘What Is Temporal Error Theory?’ Despite the fact that their paper makes significant strides in spelling out what would be required, my claim in this paper is that their position must be rejected and replaced. In addition to rejecting Baron and Miller's position, I also offer that replacement.

Keywords

temporal error theoryunreality of timephilosophy of time
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the American Philosophical Association , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , Spring 2018 , pp. 14 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © American Philosophical Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

My thanks to the postgraduate work in progress seminar at the University of Sydney for hosting a discussion of this paper, and to Kristie Miller and David Ingram for further discussion and comments. I am very grateful to the University of Sydney for hosting me while I worked on the project. I'm also very grateful to two referees for the Journal of the American Philosophical Association for great comments and discussion. They have helped the paper enormously.

References

Barbour, Julian. (1994a) ‘The Timelessness of Quantum Gravity: I. The Evidence from the Classical Theory’. Classical Quantum Gravity,’ 11, 2853–73.Google Scholar
Barbour, Julian. (1994b) ‘The Timelessness of Quantum Gravity: II. The Appearance of Dynamics in Static Configurations’. Classical Quantum Gravity, 11, 2875–97.Google Scholar
Barbour, Julian. (2000) The End of Time: The Next Revolution in Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, Samuel, and Miller, Kristie. (2014) ‘Causation in a Timeless World’, Synthese, 181, 2867–86.Google Scholar
Baron, Samuel, and Miller, Kristie. (2015) ‘What Is Temporal Error Theory?’ Philosophical Studies, 172, 2427–44.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Jeremy, and Isham, Chris. (1999) ‘On the Emergence of Time in Quantum Gravity’. In Butterfield, Jeremy (ed.), The Arguments of Time (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 111–68.Google Scholar
Cullhed, Anders. (2001) ‘Nobel Prize Authors on Time’. Nobelprize.org. https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/themes/literature/cullhed/.Google Scholar
Deutsch, David. (1997) The Fabric of Reality: The Science of Parallel Universes and Its Implications. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Dowden, Bradley. (n.d.) ‘Time’. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/time/.Google Scholar
Dyke, Heather. (2002) ‘Tokens, Dates and Tenseless Truth Conditions’. Synthese 131, 329–51.Google Scholar
Dyke, Heather. (2003) ‘Tensed Meaning: A Tenseless Account’. Journal of Philosophical Research, 28, 65–81.Google Scholar
Effingham, Nikk and Melia, Joseph. (2007) ‘Endurantism and Timeless Worlds’. Analysis, 67, 140–47.Google Scholar
Fraisse, Paul. (1984) ‘Perception and Estimation of Time’. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 1–36.Google Scholar
Fraley, Jason. (2016) ‘“Arrival” Is Masterfully Paced Sci-fi with a Thought-Provoking Twist'. WTOP. https://wtop.com/entertainment/2016/11/review-arrival-is-masterful-science-fiction-until-vexing-twist/.Google Scholar
Gielen, Steffan, and Turok, Neil. (2016) ‘Perfect Quantum Cosmological Bounce’. Physical Review Letters, 117, 021301.Google Scholar
Gödel, Kurt. (1949) ‘An Example of a New Type of Cosmological Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations of Gravitation’. Review of Modern Physics, 21, 447–50.Google Scholar
Hobana, Ion. (1986) ‘Night Broadcast.’ In Aldiss, Brian W. and Lundwall, Sam J. (eds.), The Penguin World Omnibus of Science Fiction: An Anthology (London: Penguin Books), 98–104.Google Scholar
Markosian, Ned. (2014) ‘Time’. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/time/.Google Scholar
McTaggart, J. M. E. (1908) ‘The Unreality of Time’. Mind, 17, 457–74.Google Scholar
Prior, Arthur N. (2003) ‘Now’. In Halse, Per et al. (eds.), Papers on Time and Tense (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 171–94.Google Scholar
Rovelli, Carlo. (2004). Quantum Gravity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rovelli, Carlo. (2007) ‘The Disappearance of Space and Time’. In Dieks, Dennis (ed.), The Ontology of Spacetime (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 25–36.Google Scholar
Rovelli, Carlo. (2009) ‘Forget Time’. arXiv: 0903.3832.Google Scholar
Stoll, Ira. (2017) ‘New York Times Erroneously Claims “Jewish Time Is Circular”’. Algemeiner. https://www.algemeiner.com/2017/05/07/new-york-times-erroneously-claims-jewish-time-is-circular.Google Scholar
Tallant, Jonathan. (2008) ‘What Is It to ‘‘B’’ a Relation?’ Synthese, 162, 117–32.Google Scholar
Tallant, Jonathan. (2014) ‘Immodest and Proud’. Erkenntnis, 80, 853–68.Google Scholar
Whitrow, G. J. (1989) Time in History: The Evolution of Our General Awareness of Time and Temporal Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar