Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:43:51.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weak partition relations and measurability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Mitchell Spector*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Eastern Montana College, Billings, Montana 59101

Extract

The concept of "partition relation" has proven to be extremely important in the development of the theory of large cardinals. This is due in good part to the fact that the ordinal numbers which appear as parameters in partition relations provide a natural way to define a detailed hierarchy of the corresponding large cardinal axioms. In particular, the study of cardinals satisfying Ramsey-Erdös-style partition relations has yielded a great number of very interesting large cardinal axioms which lie in strength strictly between inaccessibility and measurability. It is the purpose of this paper to show that this phenomenon does not occur if we use infinite exponent partition relations; no such partition relation has consistency strength strictly between inaccessibility and measurability. We also give a complete determination of which infinite exponent partition relations hold, assuming that there is no inner model of set theory with a measurable cardinal.

Our notation is standard. If F is a function and x is a set, then Fx denotes the range of F on x. If X is a set of ordinals and α is an ordinal, then [X]α is the collection of all subsets of X of order type α. We identify a member of [X]α with a strictly increasing function from α to X. If p ∈ [X]α and q ∈ [α]β, then the composition of p with q, which we denote pq, is a member of [X]β.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

[1]Drake, F. R., Set theory: an introduction to large cardinals, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974.Google Scholar
[2]Klkinberg, E. M., Strong partition properties for infinite cardinals, this Journal, vol. 35 (1970), pp. 410428.Google Scholar
[3]Kleinberg, E. M. and Seiferas, J., Infinite exponent partition relations and well-ordered choice, this Journal, vol. 38 (1973), pp. 299308.Google Scholar
[4]Mathias, A. R. D., Happy families, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 12 (1977), pp. 59111.Google Scholar
[5]Solovay, R. M., A model for set theory in which every set of reals is Lebesgue measurable, Annals of Mathematics, ser. 2, vol. 92 (1970), pp. 156.Google Scholar