Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:31:45.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Was Sierpiński right? IV

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Saharon Shelah*
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel Rutgers University, Department of Mathematics, New Brunswick, NJ, USA E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

We prove for any μ = μ<μ < θ < λ. λ large enough (just strongly inaccessible Mahlo) the consistency of and even for σ < μ. The new point is that possibly 0 > μ+.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Jech, Thomas, Magidor, Menachem, Mitchell, William, and Prikry, Karel, On precipitous ideals, this Journal, vol. 45 (1980), pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
[2]Laver, Richard, Making supercompact indestructible under κ-directed forcing, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 29 (1978), pp. 385–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Rabus, Mariusz and Shelah, Saharon, Consistency of partition relations, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, submitted.Google Scholar
[4]Shelah, Saharon, A weak generalization of MA to higher cardinals, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 30 (1978), pp. 297–306.Google Scholar
[5]Shelah, Saharon, On the no(M) for M of singular power, Around classification theory of models, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, no. 1182, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986, pp. 120–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Shelah, Saharon, Was Sierpiński right? I, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 62 (1988), pp. 355–380.Google Scholar
[7]Shelah, Saharon, Consistency of positive partition theorems for graphs and models, Set theory and its applications (Toronto, ON, 1987) (Steprans, J. and Watson, S., editors), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, no. 1401, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 1989, pp. 167–193.Google Scholar
[8]Shelah, Saharon, Strong partition relations below the power set: Consistency, Was Sierpiński right? II, Proceedings of the conference on set theory and its applications in honor of A. Hajnal and V. T. Sos, Budapest, 1/91, Colloquia Mathematica Societatis Janos Bolyai: Sets, Graphs, and Numbers, no. 60, 1991, pp. 637–638.Google Scholar
[9]Shelah, Saharon, Possibly every real function is continuous on a non-meagre set, Publications de L'Institute Mathématique (Beograd, Nouvelle Série), vol. 57 (1995), no. 71, pp. 47–60.Google Scholar
[10]Shelah, Saharon, Was Sierpiński right? III: Can continuum-c. c. times c. c. c. be continuum-c. c.?, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 78 (1996), pp. 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Shelah, Saharon and Stanley, Lee, Generalized Martin's axiom and Souslin's hypothesis for higher cardinals, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 43 (1982), no. 3, pp. 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Shelah, Saharon and Stanley, Lee, Corrigendum to [11], Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 53 (1986), pp. 304–314.Google Scholar