Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T20:17:15.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The tree property at ℵω+1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Dima Sinapova
Dima Sinapova*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-3875, USA, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We show that given ω many supercompact cardinals, there is a generic extension in which there are no Aronszajn trees at ℵω+1· This is an improvement of the large cardinal assumptions. The previous hypothesis was a huge cardinal and ω many supercompact cardinals above it, in Magidor–Shelah [7].

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 77 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 279 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Cummings, James and Foreman, Matthew, Diagonal Prikry extensions, this Journal, vol. 75 (2010), no. 4, pp. 1383–1402.Google Scholar
[2]Cummings, James, Foreman, Matthew, and Magidor, Menachem, Squares, scales and stationary reflection, Journal of Mathematical Logic, vol. 1 (2001), pp. 35–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Cummings, James, Canonical structure in the universe of set theory I, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 129 (2004), no. 1–3, pp. 211–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Cummings, James, Canonical structure in the universe of set theory II, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 142 (2006), no. 1–3, pp. 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Gitik, Moti and Sharon, Assaf, On SCH and the approachability property, Proceedings of the AMS, vol. 136 (2008), pp. 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Jech, Thomas, Set theory, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, 2003.Google Scholar
[7]Magidor, Menachem and Shelah, Saharon, The tree property at successors of singular cardinals, Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 35 (1996), no. 5–6, pp. 385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Neeman, Itay, Aronszajn trees and the failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis, Journal of Mathematical Logic, vol. 9 (2010), pp. 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Shelah, Saharon, Cardinal arithmetic, Oxford Logic Guides, 29, Oxford University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar