Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:47:57.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The representation theories of elementarily equivalent rings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Mike Prest
Mike Prest*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Two rings are elementarily equivalent if and only if they satisfy the same sentences in the language of rings. To some extent this is reflected in the representation theories of the two rings (one may see both positive and negative results along these lines in [5]). Here we concentrate on the case of a ring S and an elementary subring R of S.

We show that if R is an elementary subring of S then the lattice of pp formulas for R-modules embeds in that for S-modules. These lattices, moreover, have the same finite sub-posets. From this we derive some corollaries. Then we consider to what extent the compositions of induction and restriction between R- and S-modules preserve elementary equivalence.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , June 1998 , pp. 439 - 450
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Garavaglia, S., Dimension and rank in the model theory of modules, University of Michigan, East Lansing, preprint, 1979, revised 1980.Google Scholar
[2] Herrmann, C., Jensen, C. U., and Lenzing, H., Applications of model theory to representations of finite-dimensional algebras, Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 178 (1981), pp. 83–98.10.1007/BF01218373Google Scholar
[3] Herzog, I., The Ziegler spectrum of a locally coherent Grothendieck category, to appear in Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
[4] Herzog, I., Elementary duality of modules, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 340 (1993), pp. 37–69.10.1090/S0002-9947-1993-1091706-3Google Scholar
[5] Jensen, C. U. and Lenzing, H., Model theoretic algebra, Gordon and Breach, 1989.Google Scholar
[6] Prest, M., Duality and pure-semisimple rings, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 38 (1988), pp. 403–409.10.1112/jlms/s2-38.3.403Google Scholar
[7] Prest, M., Model theory and modules, London Mathematical Society Lecture Notes, no. 130, Cambridge University Press, 1988.10.1017/CBO9780511600562Google Scholar
[8] Prest, M., Tensor product and theories of modules, preprint, 1994.Google Scholar
[9] Puninski, G., Warfield rings, Algebra and Logic, vol. 33 (1994), no. 3, pp. 147–159.10.1007/BF00750230Google Scholar
[10] Puninski, G., Prest, M., and Rothmaler, Ph., Rings described by various purities, preprint, 1994.Google Scholar
[11] Ringel, C. M., Infinite-dimensional representations of finite-dimensional algebras, Symposia Mathematica, vol. 23 (1979), pp. 321–412.Google Scholar
[12] Rothmaler, Ph., Mittag-Leffler modules, to appear in Annals of Pure and Applied Logic.Google Scholar
[13] Rothmaler, Ph., Some model theory of modules II: On stability and categoricity of flat modules, this Journal, vol. 48 (1983), pp. 970–985.Google Scholar
[14] Sabbagh, G. and Eklof, P. C., Definability problems for modules and rings, this Journal, vol. 36 (1971), pp. 623–649.Google Scholar
[15] Zayed, M., Pure-semisimplicity is preserved under elementary equivalence, Glasgow Mathematical Journal, vol. 36 (1994), pp. 345–346.10.1017/S0017089500030949Google Scholar
[16] Ziegler, M., Model theory of modules, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 26 (1984), pp. 149–213.10.1016/0168-0072(84)90014-9Google Scholar
[17] Zimmermann, W., Rein injektive direkte Summen von Moduln, Communications in Algebra, vol. 5 (1977), pp. 1083–1117.Google Scholar