Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:50:40.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relational proof system for relevant logics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Ewa Orlowska
Ewa Orlowska*
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical and Applied Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences
*
Azaliowa 29, 04-539 Warsaw, Poland, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A method is presented for constructing natural deduction-style systems for propositional relevant logics. The method consists in first translating formulas of relevant logics into ternary relations, and then defining deduction rules for a corresponding logic of ternary relations. Proof systems of that form are given for various relevant logics. A class of algebras of ternary relations is introduced that provides a relation-algebraic semantics for relevant logics.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 57 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 1425 - 1440
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, N. D., Entailment: The logic of relevance and necessity, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1975.Google Scholar
[2]Belnap, N. D., Display logic, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 11 (1982), pp. 375–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Belnap, N. D., Gupta, A., and Dunn, J. M., A consecution calculus for positive relevant implication with necessitv, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 11 (1980), pp. 343–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Brady, R. T., Natural deduction systems for some quantified relevant logics, Logique et Analyse, vol. 27 (1984), pp. 355–377.Google Scholar
[5]Brady, R. T., The Gentzenization and decidability of RW, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 19 (1990), pp. 35–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Brady, R. T., Gentzenization and decidability of some contraction-less relevant logics, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 20 (1991), pp. 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Dunn, J. M., A ‘Gentzen system’ for positive relevant implication (abstract), this Journal, vol. 3 (1973), pp. 356–357.Google Scholar
[8]Dunn, J. M., Consecution formulation of positive R with cotenability and t, Entailment: The logic of relevance and necessity, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1975, pp. 381–391.Google Scholar
[9]Giambrone, S. and Kron, A., Four relevant Gentzen systems, Studia Logica, vol. XLVI (1987), pp. 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Giambrone, S. and Meyer, R. K., Completeness and conservative extension results for some Boolean relevant logics, Studia Logica, vol. XLVIII (1989), pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Giambrone, S. and Urquhart, A., Proof theories for semilattice logics, Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, vol. 33 (1987), pp. 433–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Henkin, L., Monk, D., and Tarski, A., Cylindric algebras, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985.Google Scholar
[13]Johnson, F. A., A natural deduction relevance logic, Bulletin of the Section of Logic, vol. 6 (1976), pp. 164–170.Google Scholar
[14]Orlowska, E., Relational interpretation of modal logics, Algebraic Logic (Andreka, H., Monk, D., and Nemeti, I., editors), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991, pp. 443–471; see also Bulletin of the Section of Logic, vol. 17 (1988), no. 1, pp. 2–14.Google Scholar
[15]Orlowska, E., Interpretation of relevant logics in a logic of ternary relations, Bulletin of the Section of Logic, vol. 19 (1990), no. 2, pp. 39–48.Google Scholar
[16]Orlowska, E., Nonclassical relation and cylindric algebras (manuscript), 1990.Google Scholar
[17]Orlowska, E., Algebraic aspects of relational knowledge representation: Modal relation algebras, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, (to appear).Google Scholar
[18]McRobbie, M. A., A tableau system for positive relevant implication, Bulletin of the Section of Logic, vol. 6 (1977), pp. 131–133.Google Scholar
[19]McRobbie, M. A. and Belnap, N. D., Relevant analytic tableau, Studia Logica, vol. XXXVIII (1979), pp. 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Routley, R. and Meyer, R. K., The semantics of entailment, Truth, syntax and modality (Leblanc, H., editor), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973, pp. 199–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Routley, R., Meyer, R. K., et al., Relevant logics and their rivals. Volume 1, Ridgeview, Artascadero, 1982.Google Scholar