Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T11:53:29.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patching ideal families and enforcing reflection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Christopher C. Leary
Christopher C. Leary*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Oberlin College, Oberlin, Ohio 44074
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For several years much research has been directed at ideals associated with large cardinals. In this paper we discuss ideal families and use this tool to investigate the saturation properties of various large cardinal ideals.

Much of the work in this paper is a direct outgrowth of material presented in my doctoral dissertation written at the University of Michigan under the patient guidance of Andreas Blass. I would also like to thank the referee for several helpful questions and comments on the original version of this paper.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , March 1989 , pp. 26 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[B1]Baumgartner, J., Ineffability properties of cardinals. I, Infinite and finite sets (Erdos, P. sixtieth birthday colloquium, (Keszthely, 1973; Hajnal, A.et al., editors), Colloquia Mathematica Societatis János Bolyai, vol. 10, part 1, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975, pp. 109–130.Google Scholar
[B2]Baumgartner, J., Ineffability properties of cardinals. II, Logic, foundations of mathematics and computability theory (Proceedings of the fifth international congress on logic, methodology and philosophy of science, London, Ontario, 1975; Butts, R. E. and Hintikka, J., editors), Reidel, Dordrecht, 1977, pp. 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[BTW]Baumgartner, J., Taylor, A., and Wagon, S., On splitting stationary subsets of large cardinals, this Journal, vol. 42 (1977), pp. 203–214.Google Scholar
[H]Henrion, C., Subtle ideas on subtle ideals, Ph.D. thesis, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, 1985.Google Scholar
[J1]Jech, T., Set theory, Academic Press, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
[J2]Jech, T., Stationary subsets of inaccessible cardinals, Axiomatic set theory (Baumgartner, J.et al., editors), Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 31, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1984, pp. 115–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[K1]Kunen, K., Saturated ideals, this Journal, vol. 43 (1978), pp. 65–76.Google Scholar
[K2]Kunen, K., Set theory. An introduction to independence proofs, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980.Google Scholar
[L1]Leary, C., Extensions of ideals on large cardinals, Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1985.Google Scholar
[L2]Leary, C., Patching ideal families on large cardinals, Abstracts of Papers Presented to the American Mathematical Society, vol. 7 (1986), p. 7.Google Scholar
[M1]Mitchell, W., Sets constructible from sequences of ultrafilters, this Journal, vol. 39 (1974), pp. 57–76.Google Scholar
[M2]Mitchell, W., Sets constructed from sequences of measures: revisited, this Journal, vol. 48 (1983), pp. 600–609.Google Scholar