Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:40:03.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On second order intuitionistic propositional logic without a universal quantifier

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Konrad Zdanowski
Konrad Zdanowski*
Affiliation:
Instytut Matematyczny Pan, Sniadeckich 8, 00-956 Warszawa, Poland, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine second order intuitionistic propositional logic, IPC2. Let ℱ∃ a be the set of formulas with no universal quantification. We prove Glivenko's theorem for formulas in ℱ∃ that is, for φ ∈ ℱ∃, φ is a classical tautology if and only if ┐┐φ is a tautology of IPC2. We show that for each sentence φ ∈ ℱ∃ (without free variables), φ is a classical tautology if and only if φ is an intuitionistic tautology. As a corollary we obtain a semantic argument that the quantifier ∀ is not definable in IPC2 from ⊥, ⋁, ⋀, →, ∃.

Keywords

second order intuitionistic propositional logicGlivenko theorem
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 157 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[ArtsMSc] Arts, T., Embedding first order predicate logic in second order propositional logic, Master's thesis, University of Njimegen, 1992.Google Scholar
[Fuj] Fujita, K., Galois embedding from polymorphic types into existential types, Proceedings of TLCA 2005 (Urzyczyn, P., editor), LNCS, vol. 3461, Springer, 2005, pp. 194–208.Google Scholar
[G94] Geuvers, H., Consermtivity between logics and typed lambda-calculi, Types for proofs and programs, international workshop TYPES '93 (Barendregt, H. and Nipkow, T., editors), LNCS, vol. 806, Springer, 1994, pp. 131–154.Google Scholar
[Lob76] Löb, M., Embedding first order predicate logic in fragments of intuitionistic logic, this Journal, vol. 41(4) (1976), pp. 705–718.Google Scholar
[Pol] Polacik, T., Pitts' quantifiers are not topological quantification, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 39 (1998), pp. 531–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Sob77] Sobolev, S. K., On the intuitionistic propositional calculus with quantifiers (in russian), Matematicheskie Zamietki AN SSSR, vol. 22 (1977), no. 1, pp. 69–76.Google Scholar
[SU] Sørensen, M. H. and Urzyczyn, P., Lectures on the Curry-Howard isomorphism, Elsevier, 2006.Google Scholar