Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:36:23.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leonard Linsky. Some notes on Carnap's concept of inlensional isomorphism and the paradox of analysis. Philosophy of science, vol. 16 (1949), pp. 343–347. - Rudolf Carnap. A reply to Leonard Linsky. Philosophy of science, vol. 16 (1949), pp. 347–350.

Review products

Leonard Linsky. Some notes on Carnap's concept of inlensional isomorphism and the paradox of analysis. Philosophy of science, vol. 16 (1949), pp. 343–347.
Rudolf Carnap. A reply to Leonard Linsky. Philosophy of science, vol. 16 (1949), pp. 347–350.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

W. V. Quine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 1950 , pp. 149 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)