Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:47:28.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Jean Porte. Quelques pseudo-paradoxes de la “calculabilité effective.”2e Congrès Internationale de Cybernétique, Namur, 3–10 Septembre 1958, Actes, Association Internationale de Cybernétique, Namur1960, pp. 332–334. - László Kalmár. An argument against the plausibility of Church's thesis. Constructivity in mathematics, Proceedings of the colloquium held at Amsterdam, 1957, edited by A. Heyting, Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam1959, pp. 72–80. - Rózsa Peter. Rekursivität und Konstruktivität. Constructivity in mathematics, Proceedings of the colloquium held at Amsterdam, 1957, edited by A. Heyting, Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam1959, pp. 226–233. - Elliott Mendelson. On some recent criticism of Church's thesis. Notre Dame journal of formal logic, vol. 4 no. 3 (1963), pp. 201–205.

Review products

Jean Porte. Quelques pseudo-paradoxes de la “calculabilité effective.”2e Congrès Internationale de Cybernétique, Namur, 3–10 Septembre 1958, Actes, Association Internationale de Cybernétique, Namur1960, pp. 332–334.

László Kalmár. An argument against the plausibility of Church's thesis. Constructivity in mathematics, Proceedings of the colloquium held at Amsterdam, 1957, edited by A. Heyting, Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam1959, pp. 72–80.

Rózsa Peter. Rekursivität und Konstruktivität. Constructivity in mathematics, Proceedings of the colloquium held at Amsterdam, 1957, edited by A. Heyting, Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam1959, pp. 226–233.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)