Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-02T04:13:23.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impossibility of finding relative complements for recursively enumerable degrees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

A. H. Lachlan
A. H. Lachlan*
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, Simon Frazer University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

J. R. Shoenfield conjectured in a talk at the Berkeley Model Theory Symposium (1963) that, if b and d are non-zero recursively enumerable (r.e.) degrees such that b < d then there exists an r.e. degree c such that c < d and b U c = d. G. E. Sacks echoed this conjecture at the end of [3]. In this paper the conjecture is disproved. We construct r.e. degrees b, d such that 0 < b < d and such that for no r.e. degree c is it true that c < d and b U c = d. We are grateful to G. E. Sacks for suggesting this problem.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , 02 September 1966 , pp. 434 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Kleene, S. C., Introduction to Metamathematics, Amsterdam (North Holland), Groningen (Noordhoff), New York and Toronto (Van Nostrand), 1952, x + 550 p.Google Scholar
[2]Post, E. L., Recursively enumerable sets of positive integers and their decision problems, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 50 (1944), pp. 284–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Sacks, G. E., The recursively enumerable degrees are dense, Annals of Mathematics, vol. 80 (1964), 300–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar