Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:30:53.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Finite partially-ordered quantification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Wilbur John Walkoe Jr.*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin

Extract

In [3] Henkin made the observation that certain second-order existential formulas may be thought of as the Skolem normal forms of formulas of a language which is first-order in every respect except its incorporation of a form of partially-ordered quantification. One formulation of this sort of language is the closure of a first-order language under the formation rule that is a formula whenever φ is a formula and Q, which is to be thought of as a quantifier-prefix, is a system of partial order whose universe is a set of quantifiers. Although he introduced this idea in a discussion of infinitary logic, Henkin went on to discuss its application to finitary languages, and he concluded his discussion with a theorem of Ehrenfeucht that the incorporation of an extremely simple partially-ordered quantifier-prefix (the quantifiers x, y, v, and w, with the ordering {〈x, v〉, 〈y, w〉}) into any first-order language with identity gives a language capable of expressing the infinitary quantifier 0x.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Erdös, P. and Rado, R., A partition calculus in set theory, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 62 (1956), pp. 427489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Erdös, P., Hajnal, A. and Rado, R., Partition relations for cardinal numbers, Acta mathematica, vol. 16 (1965), pp. 93196.Google Scholar
[3]Henkin, L., Some remarks on infinitely long formulas, Infinitistic methods, Proceedings of the Symposium on the Foundations of Mathematics, Warsaw, 1959, pp. 167183.Google Scholar