Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:21:09.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distinct iterable branches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

John R. Steel*
Affiliation:
University of California at Berkeley, Department of Mathematics, Berkeley, CA 94720-3840, USA, E-mail: [email protected]

Extract

§1. Introduction. The basic problem of inner model theory is how to construct mice satisfying hypotheses appreciably stronger than “there is a Woodin limit of Woodin cardinals”. We have a family of constructions, the Kc-constructions, which ought to produce such mice under the appropriate hypotheses on V. Perhaps the most important thing we lack is a proof that the countable elementary submodels of premice produced by a Kc-construction are ω1 + 1-iterable. The best partial results in this direction are those of Neeman ([4]) for Kc-constructions making use of full background extenders over V, and those of Andretta, Neeman, and Steel ([1]) for arbitrary Kc-constructions.

Let be a countable premouse embedded by π into a level of the Kc-construction ℂ. If ℂ uses only full extenders over V as its background extenders, then π and ℂ enable one to lift an evolving iteration tree on to an iteration tree * on V. (See [3, §12].) The good behavior of * guarantees that of . The natural conjecture here is that V is ω1 + 1-iterable with respect to such trees* by the strategy of choosing the unique wellfounded branch. The open question here is uniqueness, since by [2] the uniqueness of the wellfounded branch chosen by * at limit stages strictly less than λ implies the existence of a wellfounded branch to be chosen at λ.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Andretta, A., Neeman, I., and Steel, J. R., The domestic levels of Kc are iterable, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 125 (2001), pp. 157201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Martin, D. A. and Steel, J. R., Iteration trees, Journal of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 7 (1994), pp. 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Mitchell, W. J. and Steel, J. R., Fine Structure and Iteration Trees, Lecture Notes in Logic, vol. 3, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Neeman, I., Inner models in the region of a Woodin limit of Woodin cardinals, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 116 (2002), no. 1-3, pp. 67155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Neeman, I. and Steel, J. R., A weak Dodd-Jensen lemma, this Journal, (1999), no. 64, pp. 12851294.Google Scholar
[6]Steel, J. R., The Core Model Iterability Problem, Lecture Notes in Logic, vol. 8, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]-, An outline of inner model theory, Handbook of Set Theory, to appear.Google Scholar
[8]-, Local Kc-constructions, available at http://math.berkeley.edu/~steel.Google Scholar
[9]-, The derived model theorem, unpublished, available at http://math.berkeley.edu/~steel.Google Scholar
[10]Zeman, M., Inner Models and Large Cardinals, Gruyter Series in Logic and Its Applications, vol. 5, Gruyter, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar