Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-02T07:48:58.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DESCRIPTIVE PROPERTIES OF I2-EMBEDDINGS

Part of: Set theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2025

VINCENZO DIMONTE
Affiliation:
DIPARTIMENTO DI SCIENZE MATEMATICHE, INFORMATICHE E FISICHE UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI UDINE VIA DELLE SCIENZE, 206 UDINE 33100, ITALYE-mail: [email protected]
MARTINA IANNELLA*
Affiliation:
DEPARTMENT OF DISCRETE MATHEMATICS AND GEOMETRY TU WIEN WIEDNER HAUPTSTRASSE 8–10 VIENNA 1040 AUSTRIA
PHILIPP LÜCKE
Affiliation:
FACHBEREICH MATHEMATIK, UNIVERSITÄT HAMBURG BUNDESSTRASSE 55 HAMBURG, 20146 GERMANY E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

We contribute to the study of generalizations of the Perfect Set Property and the Baire Property to subsets of spaces of higher cardinalities, like the power set ${\mathcal {P}}({\lambda })$ of a singular cardinal $\lambda $ of countable cofinality or products $\prod _{i<\omega }\lambda _i$ for a strictly increasing sequence $\langle {\lambda _i}~\vert ~{i<\omega }\rangle $ of cardinals. We consider the question under which large cardinal hypothesis classes of definable subsets of these spaces possess such regularity properties, focusing on rank-into-rank axioms and classes of sets definable by $\Sigma _1$-formulas with parameters from various collections of sets. We prove that $\omega $-many measurable cardinals, while sufficient to prove the perfect set property of all $\Sigma _1$-definable sets with parameters in $V_\lambda \cup \{V_\lambda \}$, are not enough to prove it if there is a cofinal sequence in $\lambda $ in the parameters. For this conclusion, the existence of an I2-embedding is enough, but there are parameters in $V_{\lambda +1}$ for which I2 is still not enough. The situation is similar for the Baire property: under I2 all sets that are $\Sigma _1$-definable using elements of $V_\lambda $ and a cofinal sequence as parameters have the Baire property, but I2 is not enough for some parameter in $V_{\lambda +1}$. Finally, the existence of an I0-embedding implies that all sets that are $\Sigma ^1_n$-definable with parameters in $V_{\lambda +1}$ have the Baire property.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Association for Symbolic Logic

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cramer, S., Inverse limit reflection and the structure of $L\left({V}_{\lambda +1}\right)$ . Journal of Mathematical Logic , vol. 15 (2015), no. 1, 1550001, pp. 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, S., Implications of very large cardinals, Foundations of Mathematics , Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 690, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2017, pp. 225257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimonte, V., I0 and rank-into-rank axioms . Bollettino della Unione Matematica Italiana , vol. 11 (2018), no. 3, pp. 315361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimonte, V. and Ros, L. M., Generalized descriptive set theory at singular cardinals, in preparation.Google Scholar
Dimonte, V., Ros, L. M., and Shi, X., Generalized descriptive set theory at singular cardinals II, in preparation.Google Scholar
Fuchs, G., A characterization of generalized Příkrý sequences . Archive for Mathematical Logic , vol. 44 (2005), no. 8, pp. 935971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gitik, M., Prikry-type forcings, Handbook of Set Theory , Vols. 1, 2, 3, Springer, Dordrecht, 2010, pp. 13511447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jech, T., Set Theory , Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003, the third millennium edition, revised and expanded.Google Scholar
Kanamori, A., The Higher Infinite: Large Cardinals in Set Theory from their Beginnings , second ed, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003.Google Scholar
Kunen, K., Elementary embeddings and infinitary combinatorics . The Journal of Symbolic Logic , vol. 36 (1971), no. 3, pp. 407413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, R., Implications between strong large cardinal axioms . Annals of Pure and Applied Logic , vol. 90 (1997), no. 1–3, pp. 7990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, R., Reflection of elementary embedding axioms on the $L\left[{V}_{\lambda +1}\right]$ hierarchy. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 107 (2001) no. 1-3, pp. 227238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lücke, P. and Müller, S., ${\varSigma}_1$ -definability at higher cardinals: thin sets, almost disjoint families and long well-orders . Forum of Mathematics, Sigma , vol. 11 (2023): Paper No. e103, pp. 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lücke, P. and Schlicht, P., Continuous images of closed sets in generalized Baire spaces . Israel Journal of Mathematics , vol. 209 (2015), no. 1, pp. 421461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, D. A., Infinite games, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (Helsinki, 1978) , Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ, Helsinki, 1980, pp. 269273.Google Scholar
Shi, X., Axiom ${I}_0$ and higher degree theory. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 80(2015) no. 3, pp. 9701021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, J. R., An introduction to iterated ultrapowers , Forcing, Iterated Ultrapowers, and Turing Degrees , Lecture Notes Series Institute for Mathematical Sciences National University of Singapore, vol. 29, World Scientific Publication, Hackensack, NJ, 2016, pp. 123174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hugh Woodin, W., Suitable extender models II: beyond $\omega$ -huge . Journal of Mathematical Logic , vol. 11 (2011), no. 2, pp. 115436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar