Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:04:39.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Compactification of groups and rings and nonstandard analysis1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Abraham Robinson
Abraham Robinson*
Affiliation:
Yale University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Let G be a separated (Hausdorff) topological group and let *G be an enlargement of G (see [8]). Thus, *G (i) possesses the same formal properties as G in the sense explained in [8], and (ii) every set of subsets {Aν } of G with the finite intersection property—i.e. such that every nonempty finite subset of {Aν } has a nonempty intersection—satisfies ∩*Aν ≠ ø, where the *Aν are the extensions of the Aν in *G, respectively.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , February 1970 , pp. 576 - 588
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Research supported in part by the National Science Foundation, Grant No. GP-8625. The author is indebted to a referee for pointing out a number of errors in the typescript and for suggesting several changes in the presentation.

References

[1] Anzai, H. and Kakutani, S., Bohr compactifications of a locally compact abellan group. I, II, Proceedings of the Imperial Academy of Tokyo, vol. 19 (1943), pp. 476–480, 533-539.Google Scholar
[2] Fenstad, J. E., A note on “standard” versus “non-standard” topology, Proceedings of the Royal Academy of Science, North-Holland, Amsterdam, vol. 70 (1967), pp. 378–380.Google Scholar
[3] Gillman, L. and Jerison, M., Rings of continuous functions, Van Nostrand, New York, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Goldman, O. and Sah, C. H., On a special class of locally compact rings, Journal of algebra, vol. 4 (1966), pp. 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Hewitt, E. and Ross, K. A., Abstract harmonic analysis. Vol. I: Structure of topological groups. Integration theory, group representations, Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 115, Academic Press, New York, and Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1963.Google Scholar
[6] Kuoler, L., Non-standard analysis of almost periodic functions, Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif., 1966.Google Scholar
[7] Luxemburg, W. A. J., A new approach to the theory of monads, Mimeographed notes, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif., 1967.Google Scholar
[8] Robinson, A., Non-standard analysis, Studies in logic and foundations of mathematics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1966.Google Scholar
[9] Robinson, A., Non-standard theory of Dedekind rings, Proceedings of the Royal Academy of Science, North-Holland, Amsterdam, vol. 70 (1967), pp. 444–452.Google Scholar
[10] Robinson, A., Non-standard arithmetic, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 73 (1967), pp. 818–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Added in Proof. [11] Stone, A. L., Nonstandard analysis in topological algebra, Applications of model theory to algebra, analysis, and probability, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1969, pp. 285–307.Google Scholar