Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T21:02:19.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cardinal invariants of monotone and porous sets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Michael Hrušák  and
Ondřej Zindulka
Michael Hrušák
Affiliation:
Instituto De Matemáticas, Universidad Nacional Autonóma de México, Apartado Postal 61-3, Xangari, 58089, Morelia, Michoacán, México, E-mail: [email protected]
Ondřej Zindulka
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University,Thákurova 7, 160 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic, E-mail: [email protected], URL: http://mat.fsv.cvut.cz/zindulka
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A metric space (X, d) is monotone if there is a linear order < on X and a constant c such that d(x, y) ≤ c d(x, z) for all x < y < z in X. We investigate cardinal invariants of the σ-ideal Mon generated by monotone subsets of the plane. Since there is a strong connection between monotone sets in the plane and porous subsets of the line, plane and the Cantor set, cardinal invariants of these ideals are also investigated. In particular, we show that non(Mon) ≥ mσ-linked, but non(Mon) < mσ-centered is consistent. Also cov(Mon) < c and cof (N) < cov(Mon) are consistent.

Keywords

σ-monotoneσ-porouscardinal invariants
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 77 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 159 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Bartoszyński, Tomek and Judah, Haim, Set theory, A K Peters Ltd., Wellesley, MA, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Blass, Andreas and Shelah, Saharon, There may be simple Pℵ1 - and Pℵ2 -points and the Rudin-Keisler ordering may be downward directed. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 33 (1987), no. 3, pp. 213–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Brendle, Jörg, The additivity of porosity ideals, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 124 (1996), no. 1, pp. 285–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Farah, Ilijas, OCA and towers in (N) /fin, Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae, vol. 37 (1996), no. 4, pp. 861–866.Google Scholar
[5]Järvenpää, E., Järvenpää, M., Käenmäki, A., and Suomala, V., Asympotically sharp dimension estimates for k-porous sets, Mathematica Scandinavica, vol. 97 (2005), no. 2, pp. 309–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Kunen, Kenneth, Set theory, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 102, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980.Google Scholar
[7]Mattila, Pertti, Distribution of sets and measures along planes, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, Second Series, vol. 38 (1988), no. 1, pp. 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Mattila, Pertti, Geometry of sets and measures in Euclidean spaces, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 44, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Nekvinda, Aleš and Zindulka, Ondřej, A Cantor set in the plane that is not σ-monotone, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 213 (2011), no. 3, pp. 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Nekvinda, Aleš and Zindulka, Ondřej, Monotone metric spaces, Order, to appear.Google Scholar
[11]Repický, Miroslav, Porous sets and additivity of Lebesgue measure, Real Analysis Exchange, vol. 15 (1989/1990), no. 1, pp. 282–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Repický, Miroslav, Additivity of porous sets, Real Analysis Exchange, vol. 16 (1990/1991), no. 1, pp. 340–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Repický, Miroslav, Cardinal invariants related to porous sets, Set theory of the reals (Ramat Gan, 1991), Israel mathematics conference proceedings, vol. 6, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, 1993, pp. 433–438.Google Scholar
[14]Rojas-Rebolledo, Diego, Using determinacy to inscribe compact non-σ-porous sets into non-σ-porous projective sets, Real Analysis Exchange, vol. 32 (2006/1907), no. 1, pp. 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Salli, Arto, On the Minkowski dimension of strongly porous fractal sets in Rn, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society. Third Series, vol. 62 (1991), no. 2, pp. 353–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Zajíček, L., Porosity and σ-porosity, Real Analysis Exchange, vol. 13 (1987/1988) , no. 2, pp. 314–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Zajíček, L., On σ-porous sets in abstract spaces, Abstract and Applied Analysis, (2005), no. 5, pp. 509–534.Google Scholar
[18]Zajíček, Luděk and Zelený, Miroslav, Inscribing closed non-σ-lower porous sets into Suslin non-σ-lower porous sets, Abstract and Applied Analysis, (2005), no. 3, pp. 221–227.Google Scholar
[19]Zapletal, Jindřich, Forcing idealized, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 174, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Zapletal, Jindřich, Preserving P-points in definable forcing, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 204 (2009), no. 2, pp. 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Zelený, Miroslav, An absolutely continuous function with non-σ-porous graph, Real Analysis Exchange, vol. 30 (2004/1905), no. 2, pp. 547–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Zelený, Miroslav and Zajíček, Luděk, Inscribing compact non-σ-porous sets into analytic non-σ-porous sets, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 185 (2005), no. 1, pp. 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Zindulka, Ondřej, Universal measure zero, large Hausdorjf dimension, and nearly Lipschitz maps. Fundamenta Mathematicae, submitted.Google Scholar
[24]Zindulka, Ondřej, Mapping Borel sets onto balls by Lipschitz and nearly Lipschitz maps, in preparation.Google Scholar