Article contents
On skinny stationary subsets of data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a3d8/9a3d89a548d6fd08f990aec8d0fe68077e1657bb" alt=""
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 March 2014
Abstract
We introduce the notion of skinniness for subsets of and its variants, namely skinnier and skinniest. We show that under some cardinal arithmetical assumptions, precipitousness or 2λ-saturation of NSκλ ∣ X, where NSκλ denotes the non-stationary ideal over
, implies the existence of a skinny stationary subset of X. We also show that if λ is a singular cardinal, then there is no skinnier stationary subset of
. Furthermore, if λ is a strong limit singular cardinal, there is no skinny stationary subset of
. Combining these results, we show that if λ is a strong limit singular cardinal, then NSκλ ∣ X can satisfy neither precipitousness nor 2λ-saturation for every stationary X ⊆
. We also indicate that
, where
, is equivalent to the existence of a skinnier (or skinniest) stationary subset of
under some cardinal arithmetical hypotheses.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2013
References
REFERENCES
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a3d8/9a3d89a548d6fd08f990aec8d0fe68077e1657bb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a3d8/9a3d89a548d6fd08f990aec8d0fe68077e1657bb" alt=""
- 1
- Cited by