Article contents
Note on a paper in tense logic
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 March 2014
Extract
In [1, §4], my ‘proof’ that GH1 has the finite model property is incorrect; there are considerable obscurities towards the end of §1, particularly on p. 33; and I should have exhibited the finite models for GH1. In §1 of this paper I expand the analysis of the sub-directly irreducible models for GH1 which I give in §1 of [1]. In §2 I give a correct proof that GH1 has the finite model property. In §3 I exhibit these finite models as models on certain ordered sets.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1969
References
- 7
- Cited by