Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:25:06.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nonabsoluteness of elementary embeddings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Friedrich Wehrung*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
*
CNRS etUniversité de Caën, Département de Mathématiques, 14032 Caën, France

Extract

If κ is a measurable cardinal, let us say that a measure on κ is a κ-complete nonprincipal ultrafilter on κ. If U is a measure on κ, let jU be the canonical elementary embedding of V into its Ultrapower UltU(V). If x is a set, say that U moves x when jU(x)x; say that κ moves x when some measure on κ moves x. Recall Kunen's lemma (see [K]): “Every ordinal is moved only by finitely many measurable cardinals.” Kunen's proof (see [K]) and Fleissner's proof (see [KM, III, §10]) are essentially nonconstructive.

The following proposition can be proved by using elementary facts about iterated ultrapowers.

Proposition. Let ‹Un: n ∈ ω› be a sequence of measures on a strictly increasing sequence ‹κn: n ∈ ω› of measurable cardinals. Let U = ‹ Wα: α < ω2›, where Wωm + n = Um (m, n ∈ ω). Then, for each θ in UltU(V), if E is the (minimal) support of θ in UltU(V), then, for all m ∈ ω, Um moves θ iff E ∩ [ωm, ω(m + 1)) ≠ ∅.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[B]Boos, W., Lectures on large cardinal axioms, ⊨ ISILC logic conference (Kiel, 1974), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 499, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975, pp. 2588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[D]Dehornoy, P., Iterated ultrapowers and Prickry forcing, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 15 (1978), pp. 109160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Ga]Gaifman, H., Elementary embeddings of models of set-theory and certain subtheories, Axiomatic set theory (Jech, T., editor), Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 13, part 2, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1974, pp. 33101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[J]Jech, T., Set theory, Academic Press, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
[K]Kunen, K., A model for the negation of the axiom of choice, Cambridge summer school in mathematical logic (1971), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 337, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1973, pp. 489494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[K M]Kanamori, A. and Magidor, M., The evolution of large cardinal axioms in set theory, Higher set theory (proceedings, Oberwolfach, 1977), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 669, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1978, pp. 99275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar