Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T18:03:37.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modal formulas are either elementary or not ΣΔ-elementary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

J. F. A. K. van Benthem*
Affiliation:
Instituut Voor Grondslagenonderzoek, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The, Netherlands

Extract

In this paper we prove that if L is a set of modal propositional formulas then FR(L) (the class of all frames in which every formula of L holds) is elementary, Δ-elementary or not ΣΔ-elementary. For single modal formulas the second of these cases does not occur.

The model theoretic terminology and results used here are from [1]. (The underlying first order language contains only one, binary, predicate letter in addition to the identity symbol.) We presuppose familiarity with the usual notions and notations of propositional modal logic. A structure for our first order language is called a frame. (So a frame is an ordered couple 〈W, R〉 with domain W and R a binary predicate on W, i.e. a subset of W × W.) A valuation V on F is a function from the set of proposition letters to the power set of W. Using the well-known Kripke truth definition V can be extended to a function from the set of all modal propositional formulas to the power set of W. A modal propositional formula φ holds in a frame F (= 〈W, R〉) if, for all V on F, V(φ) = W. Notation: FR(φ) for the class of all frames in which φ holds. For a set L of modal propositional formulas we define FR(L) as ⋂φ∈L FR(φ). Obviously both FR(L) and cFR(L) (the complement of FR(L)) are closed under isomorphisms.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Bell, J. L. and Slomson, A. B., Models and ultraproducts, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1969.Google Scholar
[2] van Benthem, J. F. A. K., A note on modal formulae and relational properties, this Journal, vol. 40 (1975), pp. 5558.Google Scholar
[3] Goldblatt, R. I., First order definability in modal logic, this Journal, vol. 40 (1975), pp. 3540.Google Scholar