Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-l72pf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-08T04:10:31.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpretations of set theory and ordinal number theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Mariko Yasugi
Mariko Yasugi*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In [3], Takeuti developed the theory of ordinal numbers (ON) and constructed a model of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (ZF), using the primitive recursive relation ∈ of ordinal numbers. He proved:

(1) If A is a ZF-provable formula, then its interpretation A0 in ON is ON-provable;

(2) Let B be a sentence of ordinal number theory. Then B is a theorem of ON if and only if the natural translation B* of B in set theory is a theorem of ZF;

(3) (V = L)° holds in ON.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , August 1967 , pp. 145 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Gödel, K., The consistency of the axiom of choice and of the generalized continuum hypothesis with the axiom of set theory, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J., 1951.Google Scholar
[2]Lévy, A., The theory of transfinite effectivity, Technical report No. 12, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1963, pp. 1–110.Google Scholar
[3]Takeuti, G., A formalization of the theory of ordinal numbers, this Journal, vol. 31 (1966), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
[4]Takeuti, G., Recursive functions and arithmetical functions of ordinal numbers, Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress for Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, pp. 179–196.Google Scholar