Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T09:18:44.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Frege's theorem in a constructive setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

John L. Bell*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Philosophy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, CanadaN6A 3K7, E-mail: [email protected]

Extract

By Frege's Theorem is meant the result, implicit in Frege's Grundlagen, that, for any set E, if there exists a map υ from the power set of E to E satisfying the condition

then E has a subset which is the domain of a model of Peano's axioms for the natural numbers. (This result is proved explicitly, using classical reasoning, in Section 3 of [1].) My purpose in this note is to strengthen this result in two directions: first, the premise will be weakened so as to require only that the map υ be defined on the family of (Kuratowski) finite subsets of the set E, and secondly, the argument will be constructive, i.e., will involve no use of the law of excluded middle. To be precise, we will prove, in constructive (or intuitionistic) set theory, the following

Theorem. Let υ be a map with domain a family of subsets of a set E to E satisfying the following conditions:

(i) ø ϵdom(υ)

(ii)∀U ϵdom(υ)∀x ϵ EUUx ϵdom(υ)

(iii)∀UV ϵdom(5) υ(U) = υ(V) ⇔ UV.

Then we can define a subset N of E which is the domain of a model of Peano's axioms.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Bell, J.L., Type reducing correspondences and well-orderings: Frege's and Zermelo's constructions re-examined, this Journal, vol. 60 (1995), no. 1, pp. 209–220.Google Scholar