Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:19:07.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Completeness theorem for biprobability models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Miodrag D. Rašković*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Yugoslavia

Extract

The aim of the paper is to prove the completeness theorem for biprobability models. This also solves Keisler's Problem 5.4 (see [4]).

Let be a countable admissible set and ω. The logic is similar to the standard probability logic . The only difference is that two types of probability quantifiers and are allowed.

A biprobability model is a structure (, μ1, μ2) where is a classical structure without operations and μ1, μ2 are two types of probability measures such that μ1 is absolutely continuous with respect to μ2, i.e. μ1μ2.

The quantifiers are interpreted in the natural way, i.e.

for i = 1, 2. (The measure is the restriction of the completion of to the σ-algebra generated by the measurable rectangles and the diagonal sets

Axioms and rules of inference are those of , as listed in [2] with the axiom B4 from [4], with the remark that both P1 and P2 can play the role of P, together with the following axioms:

Axioms of continuity.

  • 1) .

  • 2) .

Axiom of absolute continuity:

where and Φn = {φΦ: φ has n free variables}.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Barwise, J., Admissible sets and structures, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Hoover, D., Probability logic, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 14 (1978), pp. 287313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Keisler, H. J., Hyperfinite model theory, Logic Colloquium '76, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977, pp. 5–110.Google Scholar
[4]Keisler, H. J., Probability quantifiers, Chapter 14 in Model theoretic languages (Barwise, J. and Feferman, S., editors), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985.Google Scholar