Article contents
Spirit mediumship and the state in mainland Southeast Asia: A comparative perspective
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2020
Abstract
This comparative study examines the complex, changing configurations of the relationships between the state and mediumship cults, under different regimes and histories in three Southeast Asian states and China. Spirit mediums are endowed with charismatic authority, owing to their access to the supernatural sphere, which stands in implicit tension with the authority of the state. This tension underlies state–mediumship relationships in Southeast Asia, but leads to diverse dynamics, according to the place of religion in each state. In the atheist, communist/post-communist states (China and Vietnam) mediumship is primarily approached as a political issue; in Buddhist Thailand as a religious issue, and in multicultural Malaysia, where Islam is the official religion, as a legal issue. Tensions prevail particularly in the communist/post-communist states, where there has been a resurgence of mediumship cults, even as these are officially proscribed as ‘superstitions’. In Thailand tensions have been ameliorated by a gradual amalgamation of the cults and popular Buddhism, while in Malaysia tensions are prevented by controls over religious practices. Further research on the relatively neglected issue of the relationship between the state and mediumship cults in the emergent regions of the world is suggested.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The National University of Singapore, 2020
References
1 Endres, Kirsten W. and Lauser, Andrea, Engaging the spirit world: Popular beliefs in Southeast Asia (New York: Berghahn, 2013)Google Scholar; Winzeler, Robert E., Popular religion in Southeast Asia (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016)Google Scholar.
2 For example, Makley, Charlene E., ‘The politics of presence: Voice, possession, and dilemmas of development among Tibetans in the People's Republic of China’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 55, 3 (2013): 665–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Anh, Vu Thi Thu, ‘The modernization of Đao Mẫu: The impact of political ideology and commercialism on the worship of the Mother Goddess in Vietnam’, Journal of Indigenous Social Development 4, 1 (2015): 1–17Google Scholar; White, Erick, ‘Fraudulent and dangerous popular religiosity in the public sphere: Moral campaigns to prohibit, reform, and demystify Thai Spirit mediums’, in Spiritual politics: Religion and public life in contemporary Southeast Asia, ed. Williard, Andrew C.W. and George, Kenneth M. (Ithaca, NY: Southeast Asia Program Publications [SEAP], Cornell University, 2005), pp. 69–91Google Scholar.
3 Cohen, Erik, The Chinese Vegetarian Festival in Phuket: Religion, ethnicity and tourism on a southern Thai island (Bangkok: White Lotus, 2001)Google Scholar; Cohen, E., ‘The Vegetarian Festival and the City Pillar: The appropriation of a Chinese religious custom for a cult of the Thai civic religion’, Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change 10, 1 (2012): 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 DeBernardi, Jean, The way that lives in the heart: Religion and spirit mediumship in Penang, Malaysia (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar.
5 For example, Cesari, Jocelyn, ‘Disciplining religion: The role of the state and its consequences for democracy’, Journal of Religious and Political Practice 2, 2 (2016): 135–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Laborde, Cécile, ‘Political liberalism and religion: On separation and establishment, Journal of Political Philosophy 23, 1 (2013): 67–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tamadonfar, Mehran and Jelen, Ted G., eds., Religion and regimes: Support, separation and opposition (Lanham, MD: Lexington, 2014)Google Scholar.
6 Laborde, ‘Political liberalism and religion’, pp. 67–8.
7 For example, Elliott, Alan J.A., Chinese medium spirit-cults in Singapore (London: Athlone, 1955)Google Scholar; Irvine, W. Nigel, ‘Decline of village spirit cults and growth of urban spirit mediumship: The persistence of spirit beliefs, the position of women and modernization’, Australian Journal of Anthropology 14, 4 (1984): 315–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8 Morris, Rosalind C., ‘Modernity's media and the end of mediumship? On the aesthetic economy of transparency in Thailand’, Public Culture 12, 2 (2000): 457–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 Lee, R.M., ‘Continuity and change in Chinese spirit mediumship in urban Malaysia’, Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 142, 2–3 (1986): 209–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Endres, Kirsten W., ‘Spirited modernities: Mediumship and ritual performativity in late socialist Vietnam’, in Modernity and re-enchantment: Religion in post-revolutionary Vietnam, ed. Taylor, Philip (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2007), p. 195Google Scholar.
11 Ibid.
12 Endres and Lauser, Engaging the spirit world; Norton, Barley, Songs for the spirits: Music and mediums in North Vietnam (Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 2009)Google Scholar; Taylor, Philip, Goddess on the rise: Popular religion in Vietnam (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Taylor, Philip, Modernity and re-enchantment: Religion in post-revolutionary Vietnam (Singapore: ISEAS, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Winzeler, Popular religion in Southeast Asia.
13 Kitiarsa, Patana, ed., Religious commodifications in Asia: Marketing gods (London: Routledge, 2008)Google Scholar.
14 White, ‘Fraudulent and dangerous popular religiosity’.
15 Makley, Charlene E., ‘The politics of presence: Voice, possession, and dilemmas of development among Tibetans in the People's Republic of China’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 55, 3 (2013): 670CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
16 Irvine, ‘Decline of village spirit cults’.
17 Makley, ‘The politics of presence’, p. 666.
18 Bunkenborg, Mikkel, ‘From metaphors of empire to enactments of state: Popular religious movements and health in China’, Positions 22, 3 (2014): 573–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
19 Ibid., p. 573.
20 Chan, Margaret, ‘Contemporary Daoist tangki practices’, Oxford handbooks online (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015), DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935420.013.11Google Scholar.
21 Ibid., n.p.
22 Ibid., n.p.
23 Ibid., n.p.
24 Chau, Adam Yuet, Miraculous response: Doing popular religion in contemporary China (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar.
25 Goossaert, Vincent and Ling, Fang, ‘Temples and Daoists in urban China since 1980’, China Perspectives 4, 2 (2009): 39Google Scholar.
26 Ibid., p. 32.
27 Dean, Kenneth, Lord of the Three in One: The spread of a cult in Southeast China (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998), pp. 30ffGoogle Scholar.
28 Cline, Erin M., ‘Female spirit mediums and religious authority in contemporary southeastern China’, Modern China 36, 5 (2010): 520–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
29 Bunkenborg, ‘From metaphors of empire to enactments of state’, p. 573; Chan, Selina Ching and Lang, Graeme S., ‘Temple construction and the revival of popular religion in Jinhua’, China Information 21, 1 (2007): 43–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chau, Adam Yuet, ‘The politics of legitimation and the revival of popular religion in Shaanbei, north-central China’, Modern China 31, 2 (2005): 236–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Ya-ning, Kao, ‘Religious revival among the Zhuang people in China: Practicing “superstition” and standardizing a Zhuang religion’, Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 2 (2014): 107–44Google Scholar.
30 Chau, Miraculous response, p. 6.
31 Makley, ‘The politics of presence’, p. 670.
32 Cohen, ‘Ethnic tourism in mainland Southeast Asia’.
33 Chau, ‘The politics of legitimation’, p. 236.
34 Ibid.
35 Makley, ‘The politics of presence’, p. 668.
36 Kao, ‘Religious revival among the Zhuang people’, p. 107.
37 Goossaert and Ling, ‘Temples and Daoists’, p. 37.
38 Chau, Miraculous response, p. 3.
39 Makley, ‘The politics of presence’.
40 Ibid., pp. 666, 667.
41 Chan and Lang, ‘Temple construction’, p. 43.
42 Makley, ‘The politics of presence’, p. 667.
43 Ibid.
44 Ibid., pp. 667–8.
45 Ibid., p. 668.
46 Nghia, Hoang Van, ‘Religious diversity and the right to freedom of religion in Vietnam’, Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 4, 1 (2015): 219Google Scholar.
47 Taylor, Goddess on the rise, p. 38.
48 Malarney, Shaun K., ‘Return to the past? The dynamics of contemporary religious and ritual transformation’, in Postwar Vietnam: Dynamics of a transforming society, ed. Luong, Hy Van (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2003), pp. 227Google Scholar.
49 Anh, Vu Thi Thu, ‘Worshipping the Mother Goddess: The Đao Mẫu movement in North Vietnam’, Explorations in Southeast Asian Studies 6, 1 (2006): 27–44Google Scholar.
50 Ibid.
51 Vu, ‘The modernization of Đao Mẫu’.
52 For example, Doan Thi Tuyen, ‘The reemergence of spirit mediums: Then practice among the Tay in contemporary Vietnam’ (Ph.D. diss., University of Washington, Seattle, 2011); Taylor, Philip, ‘The ethnicity of efficacy: Vietnamese goddess worship and the encoding of popular histories’, Asian Ethnicity 3, 1 (2002): 85–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Taylor, Goddess on the rise.
53 Lauser, Andrea, Staging the spirits: Lên dổng — cult-culture-spectacle. Performatic contexts of a Vietnamese ritual from controlled possession to staged performance (Göttingen: Georg August University, Göttingen Institute for Social and Cultural Anthropology, 2018), p. 6Google Scholar.
54 Vu, ‘Worshipping the Mother Goddess’, p. 27.
55 Salemink, Oscar, ‘Ritual efficacy, spiritual security and human security: Spirit mediumship in contemporary Vietnam’, Vietnam Social Sciences 6 (2014): 64Google Scholar.
56 Endres, ‘Spirited modernities’; Fjelstad, Karen and Hien, Nguyen Thi, ‘Introduction’, in Possessed by the spirits: Mediumship in contemporary Vietnam, ed. Fjelstad, K. and Hien, Nguyen Thi (Ithaca, NY: SEAP, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Taylor, Goddess on the rise.
57 Vu, ‘Worshipping the Mother Goddess’, p. 34.
58 Ibid., p. 27.
59 Ibid., p. 33.
60 Vu, ‘The modernization of Đao Mẫu’, p. 2.
61 Salemink, ‘Ritual efficacy’, pp. 71–2.
62 Ibid., p. 69.
63 Vu, ‘The modernization of Đao Mẫu’, p. 9.
64 Ibid., p. 5.
65 Endres, ‘Spirited modernities’, pp. 202–3.
66 Vu, ‘The modernization of Đao Mẫu’, p. 5.
67 Norton, Barley, ‘“The moon remembers Uncle Ho”: The politics of music and mediumship in northern Vietnam’, British Journal of Ethnomusicology 11, 1 (2002): 71CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
68 Salemink, ‘Ritual efficacy’, p. 59.
69 Vu, ‘The modernization of Đao Mẫu’, p. 5.
70 Fjelstad and Nguyen, ‘Introduction’, p. 8.
71 Vu, ‘The modernization of Đao Mẫu’, p. 5.
72 Norton, ‘The moon remembers Uncle Ho’, p. 71.
73 Vu, ‘The modernization of Đao Mẫu’, p. 6.
74 Ibid.
75 Ibid.
76 Lauser, Staging the spirits, pp. 9–10.
77 Ibid., p. 10.
78 Vu, ‘The modernization of Đao Mẫu’, p. 12.
79 Taylor, Goddess on the rise, p. 45.
80 Salemink, Oscar, ‘Spirit worship and possession in Vietnam and beyond’, in Routledge handbook of religions in Asia, ed. Turner, Bryan S. and Salemink, O. (London: Routledge, 2015), p. 241Google Scholar.
81 Ibid.
82 Ibid.
83 Ibid., pp. 241–2.
84 Ibid., p. 242.
85 Tatsuki, Kataoka, ‘Religion as non-religion: The place of Chinese temples in Phuket, southern Thailand’, Southeast Asian Studies 1, 3 (2012): 461–85Google Scholar.
86 White, ‘Fraudulent and dangerous popular religiosity’, p. 70.
87 Ibid., pp. 69–70.
88 Morris, ‘Modernity's media and the end of mediumship?’; Wilson, Ara, ‘The sacred geography of Bangkok's markets’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 12, 3 (2008): 631–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
89 Irvine, W. Nigel, ‘Decline of village spirit cults and growth of urban spirit mediumship: The persistence of spirit beliefs, the position of women and modernization’, Australian Journal of Anthropology 14, 4 (1984): 315–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tambiah, Stanley, Buddhism and the spirit cults of North-East Thailand (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970)Google Scholar.
90 White, ‘Fraudulent and dangerous popular religiosity’, p. 74.
91 Kitiarsa, Patana, ‘Beyond syncretism: Hybridization and popular religion in contemporary Thailand’, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 36, 3 (2005): 471CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
92 Ibid., pp. 469–77, 478.
93 Hayashi, Yukio, Practical Buddhism among the Thai–Lao: Religion in the making of a region (Kyoto: Kyoto University Press, 2003)Google Scholar; Wilson, ‘The sacred geography of Bangkok's markets’.
94 Wilson, ‘The sacred geography of Bangkok's markets’, p. 8.
95 Visisya summarising Hayashi, Practical Buddhism, pp. 199–201. See V. Pinthongvijayakul, ‘Performing the Isan subject: Spirit mediums and ritual embodiment in a transitional agrarian society’ (PhD diss., The Australian National University, Canberra, 2015), p. 4.
96 White, ‘Fraudulent and dangerous popular religiosity’, p. 73.
97 Ibid., p. 74.
98 Ibid., p. 78.
99 See for example, Hayashi, Practical Buddhism.
100 Pinthongvijayakul, ‘Performing the Isan subject’, pp. ii; iii.
101 Ibid., p. 4.
102 Ibid., p. 146.
103 Ibid., p. 4.
104 Ibid., p. 159.
105 Ibid., pp. 146, 160–61.
106 Work, Courtney, ‘The persistent presence of Cambodian spirits: Contemporary knowledge production in Cambodia’, in The handbook of contemporary Cambodia, ed. Brickell, K. and Springer, S. (London: Routledge, 2016)Google Scholar. See also the picture of a possessed Cambodian Buddhist monk in Didier Bertrand, ‘A medium possession practice and its relationship with Cambodian Buddhism’, in History, Buddhism, and new religious movements in Cambodia, ed. Marston, John and Guthrie, Elizabeth (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2004), p. 156CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
107 Pinthongvijayakul, ‘Performing the Isan subject’, p. iii.
108 Cohen, The Chinese Vegetarian Festival in Phuket; Cohen, ‘The Vegetarian Festival and the City Pillar’.
109 Cohen, The Chinese Vegetarian Festival in Phuket, pp. 25–8.
110 Cheu, Hock Tong, ‘The festival of the Nine Emperor Gods in peninsular Southeast Asia’, in Chinese beliefs and practices in Southeast Asia, ed. Cheu, H.T. (Petaling Jaya: Pelanduk, 1993)Google Scholar.
111 Annette Hamilton, ‘Kwan Im, Nine Emperor Gods, and Chinese “spirits” in southern Thailand’, paper presented at 7th International Conference on Thai Studies, Amsterdam, 4–7 July 1999.
112 Cohen, The Chinese Vegetarian Festival in Phuket.
113 S. Kantavanich, ‘Gruesome festival “has gone too far”’, Phuket Gazette, 1 Oct. 1999, pp. 1–2.
114 Ibid., p. 2.
115 Cohen, The Chinese Vegetarian Festival in Phuket, illls. 4.7, 4.8.
116 Cohen, ‘The Vegetarian Festival and the City Pillar’, p. 3.
117 Ibid., p. 12.
118 Ibid., pp. 13–14.
119 Reynolds, Frank E., ‘Civic religion and national community in Thailand’, Journal of Asian Studies 36, 2 (1977): 267–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
120 Cohen, ‘The Vegetarian Festival and the City Pillar’, p. 18.
121 Pinthongvijayakul, ‘Performing the Isan subject’.
122 Chukwunenye, C.N. and Hamidin, A.H., ‘Religion in a secular state and state religion in practice: Assessing religious influence, tolerance, and national stability in Nigeria and Malaysia’, Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 13, 39 (2014): 203–35Google Scholar.
123 Mohamad, Mohd Azizuddin Sani and Shah, Dian Abdul Hamid, ‘Freedom of religious expression in Malaysia’, Journal of International Studies 7 (2020): 33–49Google Scholar.
124 Means, Gordon P., ‘Soft authoritarianism in Malaysia and Singapore’, Journal of Democracy 7, 4 (1996): 103–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
125 Jamal, Arif A., ‘Managing religion through “religious harmony”: The case of Singapore’, in Religious rules, state law, and normative pluralism: A comparative overview, vol. 18, ed. Bottoni, Rossella, Cristofori, Rinaldo and Ferrari, Silvio (Dordrecht: Springer, 2016), p. 325Google Scholar; Singapore Coordination Programme, ‘About Singapore’, n.d., https//www.scp.gov.sg/content/scp/about_us/about_singapore.html.
126 Noor, Noraini M. and Leong, Chan Hoong, ‘Multiculturalism in Malaysia and Singapore’, International Journal of Intercultural Relations 37, 6 (2013): 714–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
127 Barr, Michael D. and Govindasamy, Anantha B., ‘The Islamization of Malaysia: Religious nationalism in the service of ethnonationalism’, Australian Journal of International Affairs 64, 3 (2010): 293–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Adnan, Zatul Himmah, Siddiquee, Noore Alam and Baulderstone, Jo, ‘The perspective of multi-religious society on Islamization policy in Malaysia’, Asian Journal of Political Science 24, 2 (2016): 196–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
128 DeBernardi, The way that lives in the heart, p. 25.
129 Ibid.
130 Ibid.
131 Haque, M. Shamsul, ‘The role of the state in managing ethnic tensions in Malaysia: A critical discourse’, American Behavioral Scientist 17, 3 (2003): 242Google Scholar.
132 DeBernardi, Jean, Penang: Rites of belonging in a Malaysian Chinese community (Singapore: NUS Press, 2009), p. 11Google Scholar.
133 U.S. Department of State, Malaysia 2014 International Religious Freedom Report, 2015, https://www.state.gov/documents/organizations/238522.pdf.
134 Sani and Shah, ‘Freedom of religious expression in Malaysia’, p. 33.
135 U.S. Department of State, Malaysia 2014 International Religious Freedom Report.
136 Firth, Raymond, ‘Ritual and drama in Malay spirit mediumship’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 9, 2 (1967): 190–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
137 Lee, ‘Continuity and change in Chinese spirit mediumship’; Ward, C., 1984, ‘Thaipusam in Malaysia’, Ethos 12, 4 (1984): 307–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
138 Lee, Y.F. and Chin, Y.M., ‘Datuk Kong worship and Chinese religion in Malaysia: Reflections on syncretism, pragmatism and inclusiveness’, in After migration and religious affiliation: Religions, Chinese identities and transnational networks, ed. Chee, Tan Beng (Singapore: World Scientific 2014), pp. 147–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
139 Chan, Margaret, Ritual is theatre, theatre is ritual: Tank-ki Chinese spirit medium worship (Singapore: Singapore Management University, 2006)Google Scholar; Elliott, Alan J.A., Chinese medium spirit-cults in Singapore (London: Athlone, 1955)Google Scholar; DeBernardi, The way that lives in the heart; Heng, Terence, ‘Unofficial’ sacred space: Spirit mediums and house temples in Singapore, Geographical Review 106, 2 (2016): 215–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lee, ‘Continuity and change in Chinese spirit mediumship’.
140 Elliott, Chinese medium spirit-cults in Singapore.
141 Lee, ‘Continuity and change in Chinese spirit mediumship’, p. 199.
142 Goh, Daniel P.S., ‘Chinese religion and the challenge of modernity in Malaysia and Singapore: Syncretism, hybridization and transfiguration’, Asian Journal of Social Science 37 (2009): 121CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
143 Lee, ‘Continuity and change in Chinese spirit mediumship’, p. 199.
144 Ibid., p. 200.
145 Ibid., p. 201.
146 Ibid., p. 200; Lee, B.-O., Kirmayer, L.J. and Groleau, D., ‘Therapeutic processes and perceived helpfulness of dang-ki (Chinese shamanism) from symbolic healing perspective’, Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 34 (2010): 56–105CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
147 Lee, ‘Continuity and change in Chinese spirit mediumship’, p. 203.
148 DeBernardi, The way that lives in the heart.
149 Lee, ‘Continuity and change in Chinese spirit mediumship’, p. 200.
150 Ibid., p. 204.
151 Jean DeBernardi, ‘Commodifying blessings: Celebrating the double-yang festival in Penang, Malaysia and Wudang Mountain, China’, in Kitiarsa, Religious commodifications in Asia, pp. 49–67; DeBernardi, Penang: Rites of belonging; Seong, Goh Sang, ‘Penang Chinese customs and traditions’, Kajian Malaysia 33, suppl. 2 (2015): 148–9Google Scholar; Penang Tourist News, ‘Nine Emperor Gods festival celebration’, 8 Aug. 2015.
152 Goh, ‘Penang Chinese customs and traditions’, p. 149.
153 myPenang, Nine Emperor Gods Festival’, n.d., https://www.mypenang.my/index.php/religious-celebrations/171-nine-emperor-gods-festival (last accessed 2 May 2020).
- 1
- Cited by