Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T23:18:11.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ‘Indianization’ of Southeast Asia: Reflections on the Historical Sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2011

I. W. Mabbett
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

From about the second century onwards, principalities (“empires” is probably the wrong word in all the earlier cases) began to appear in Southeast Asia, first along the isthmus of the Malay Peninsula, round the coast of the Gulf of Siam and of the southern part of Vietnam, later in the archipelago and eventually spreading throughout the area now known as Southeast Asia except for the north of Vietnam and parts of the archipelago in the east. These principalities are assigned to the historical record by inscriptions using Indian languages and scripts, stone remains attesting Hindu and Buddhist cults, and foreign accounts, mostly Chinese, indicating various features of Indian culture. Two of the questions which underlie historical studies of this evidence are: how did Indian influence spread through Southeast Asia? and, how far did Indian influence dominate Southeast Asia? In principle, these questions may be answered independently of each other, the first being chiefly concerned with the “Indianization I” discussed in an earlier article, the second with “Indianization II”. Attention will be directed here chiefly to the first, and to the second primarily only to the extent that is entailed by examination of the first. Various conflicting views have been advanced by historians; the purpose here is to suggest that, in the absence of convincing evidence for any one of them, an eclectic interpretation is not only legitimate but cogent.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , September 1977 , pp. 143 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Another important question, recently re-opened, is when Indianized states first appeared. See Christie, A. in R. C. Majumdar Felicitation Volume, ed. Sarkar, H. B. (Calcutta, 1970)Google Scholar.

2 Mabbett, I. W., “The ‘Indianization’ of Southeast Asia: Reflections on the Prehistoric Sources”, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, VIII, 1 (1977), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Poussin, L. de la Vallée, “L'Inde aux Temps des Mauryas et des Barbares, Grecs, Scythes, Parthes, et Yue-tchi”, Histoire du Monde, VI, 1 (Paris, 1930)Google Scholar; Moens, J. L., “Śrīvijaya, Yāva en Katāha”, Tijdschrift voor Indische Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, LXXVII, 3 (1937), 317–487.Google Scholar

4 Berg, C. C., Hoofdlijnen der Javaansche Litteratuur-Geschiedenis, (Groningen, 1929)Google Scholar.

5 Majumdar, R. C., Hindu Colonies in the Far East (Calcutta, 1944/1963)Google Scholar; idem, Ancient Indian Colonies in the Far East: Vol. 2, Suvarnadvipa, Part 1, Political History (Dacca, 1937), Part 2, Cultural History (Calcutta, 1938).

6 Majumdar, R. C., Suvarnadvipa, op. cit., Vol. 1, 109, 138–147.Google Scholar

7 Krom, N. J., Hindoe-javaansche geschiedenis, (₼s Gravenhage, 1926)Google Scholar; SirWinstedt, Richard, J.M.B.R.A.S., XIII, 1 (1935), 18Google Scholar; Ferrand, G., “Le K₼ouen-louen”, Journal Asiatique, XIV (1919), 15 ff.Google Scholar

8 van Naerssen, F. H. in Orientalia Neerlandica (Leiden, 1948Google Scholar); Cultural Conflicts and Social Conflicts in Indonesia (South Asia Institute, 1946)Google Scholar; cp. Groslier, B. P., “Our Knowledge of Khmer Civilisation: A Re-appraisal”, J.S.S., XLVIII, 1 (1960), 1–28.Google Scholar

9 Paris, 1948; revised edition 1964.

10 Coedès, G., “Le Substrat Autochtone et la Superstructure Indienne au Cambodge et à Java”, Cahiers d'Histoire Mondiale, I, 2 (1953), 368–377Google Scholar; “L'Osmose Indienne en Indochine et en Indonésie”, Ibid., I, 4 (1954), 827–838, especially at pp. 830 f.; “Some Problems in the Ancient History of the Hinduized States of Southeast Asia”, J.S.E.A.H., V (1964), 1–14.Google Scholar

11 van Leur, J. C., “On Early Asian Trade”, Indonesian Trade and Society (The Hague/Bandung, 1955), p. 95Google Scholar.

12 Bosch, F. D. K., Selected Studies in Indonesian Archaeology (The Hague, 1961), pp. 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Wheatley, P., “Desultory Remarks on the Ancient History of the Malay Peninsula”, Malayan and Indonesian Studies, ed. Bastin, J. and Roolvink, R. (Oxford, 1964), pp. 33–75Google Scholar; The Golden Khersonese (Kuala Lumpur, 1961); “Comment on the Dynamics of the Process of Indianization” in Sandhu, K. S., Early Malaysia (Singapore, 1973), pp. 37–49.Google Scholar

14 B. P. Groslier, op. cit., especially at p. 10.

15 Mus, P., “Cultes Indiens et Indigènes au Champa”, B.E.F.E.O., XXXIII (1933), 367–410.Google Scholar

16 Mus, P., India Seen from the East (Monash University, Australia, 1975Google Scholar). See Introduction, pp. vii–xii.

17 Wales, H. G. Q., The Making of Greater India (London, 1951)Google Scholar.

18 The conventional dating of “Indianized” states from the first two centuries A.D. is not without its problems. Recent research tends to push forward the earliest date for the rise of centralized states with peasant or organized populations, and the beginning of “Indianization” is explicitly shifted to the fourth or fifth centuries by Christie, A. in R. C. Majumdar Felicitation Volume, ed. Sarkar, H. B. (Calcutta, 1970)Google Scholar.

19 Malleret, L., L'Archéologie du delta du Mekong, I–IV (Paris, 1959–1963).Google Scholar

20 Ibid., III, 324.

21 Ibid., III, 324; IV, 131.

22 Hill, R. D., “Rice in Malaya: A study in historical geography”, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis (University of Singapore, 1973), 80Google Scholar, Also Kuala Lumpur (OUP), in press. Also see I. W. Mabbett, op. cit.

23 Pelliot, P., “Le Fou-nan”, B.E.F.E.O., III, (1903), 248–327.Google Scholar

24 Wheatley, P., The Golden Khersonese (Kuala Lumpur, 1961), pp. 1–119.Google Scholar

25 Chin History, Ch. 97, p. 7, verso. See P. Pelliot, “Le Fou-nan”, 254.

26 See G. Coedès, Les États hindouisés, op. cit., p. 82.

27 This follows the translation of R. C. Majumdar, Champa, III, 23.

28 SirBraddell, Roland, “Ancient Times in the Malay Peninsula”, J.M.B.R.A.S., XVII, 1, (1939), 181 ff.Google Scholar

29 Coedès, G., “Etudes Cambodgiennes, I”, B.E.F.E.O., XI, (1911), 391–393Google Scholar.

30 See especially P. Mus, op. cit.

31 P. Pelliot, op. cit., 265.

32 See G. Coedès, Les États hindouisés, op. cit., p. 82.

33 P. Pelliot, op. cit., 264.

34 Ch. 54. This follows the translation of P. Wheatley, op. cit., p. 48.

35 Finot, L., “Notes d'Epigraphie Indochinoise, XIV; Les Inscriptions du Musee de Hanoi”, B.E.F.E.O., XV, 2, (1915), 1–3Google Scholar.

36 Coedès, G., Indian Historical Quarterly, XVI, (1940), 484–488.Google Scholar

37 Sircar, D. C., “Date of the Earliest Sanskrit Inscription of Campa”, Indian Historical Quarterly, XVII, 1, (1941), 107–110.Google Scholar

38 E. Gaspardone, in Journal Asiatique (1953), 477–485.

39 Coedès, G., “Etudes Cambodgiennes, XXV”, B.E.F.E.O., XXXI, (1931), 1–8.Google Scholar

40 Ibid., pp. 9–12.

41 Coedès, G., “A New Inscription from Fu-nan”, J.G.I.S., IV, (1937), 117–121.Google Scholar

42 P. Wheatley, op. cit., p. 15.

43 Ibid., p. 16.

44 Ibid., p. 17.

45 Ch. 331, and Ibid., p. 48 f.

46 Ibid., p. 50.

47 P. Pelliot, op. cit., 263, n. 1.

48 P. Wheatley, op. cit., p. 20 f.

49 Ibid., p. 17.

50 Pelliot, P., “Deux itinéraires de Chine en Inde à la fin du VIIIe siècle”, B.E.F.E.O., IV, (1904), 279, n.4.Google Scholar

51 P. Wheatley, op. cit., p. 17, n.2.

52 Ibid., pp. 32–36.

53 Ibid., p. 26.

54 G. Coedès, Les États hindouisés, op. cit., p. 148 ff., who follows the translation of d'Hervey de Saint-Denys and gives other references.

55 Ibid., p. 150.

56 P. Wheatley, op. cit., p. 29.

57 Ibid., pp. 253–265.

58 Ibid., pp. 51–55.

59 Bronsen, B. and Dales, G. F., “Excavations at Chansen, Thailand, 1968 and 1969: a preliminary report”, Asian Perspectives XV (1972), 15–46.Google Scholar

60 See A. Foucher, Iconographie bouddhique, pp. 77–84.

61 Coedès, G., “Excavations at Pʼong Tük in Siam”, Annual Bibliography of Indian Archaeology (Leyden, 1927), 16–20.Google Scholar

62 See SirBraddell, Roland, “Ancient Times in the Malay Peninsula”, J.M.B.R.A.S., XV, 3, (1937), 89.Google Scholar

63 G. Coedès, Les États hindouises, op. cit., p. 42.

64 See, e.g. Wales, , “Archaeological Researches on Ancient Indian Colonisation in Malaya”, J.M.B.R.A.S., XVIII, 1, (1940), 1–85Google Scholar; Wales, H.G. Quaritch and Wales, D.C., “Further Work on Indian Sites in Malaya”, J.M.B.R.A.S., XX, 1, (1947), 1–11Google Scholar; idem, “The Sambas Finds in Relation to the Problems of the Indo-Malaysian Art Development”, ibid., XXII, 4, (1949), 23–32.

65 Evans, I. H. N., “Excavations at Tanjong Rawa, Kuala Selinsing, Perak”, Journal of the Federated Malay States’ Museums, XV, 3, (1932), 79–133.Google Scholar

66 See Beck, H.C., “Notes on Sundry Asiatic Beads”, Man CXXXIV, (1930), 166–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Collings, H. D., “Recent Finds of Iron Age Sites in Southern Perak and Selangor, Federated Malay Settlements”, Bulletin of the Raffles Museum, Series B, I, 2, (1937), 75–94Google Scholar. For a recent discussion of the site, see Rajah, N., “The Indianised Culture of North-western Malaya (West Malaysia)”, Unpublished M.A. thesis (Australian National University, Canberra, 1973), 18–29.Google Scholar

67 N. Rajah, loc. cit.

68 Lamb, H. A., “Miscellaneous Papers on Early Hindu and Buddhist Settlements in Northern Malaya and Southern Thailand”, F.M.J. n.s., VI, (1961), 82.Google Scholar

69 Wales, H. G. Q., “Archaeological Researches on Ancient Indian Colonies in Malaya”, J.M.B.R.A.S., XVIII, 1, (1940), 55.Google Scholar

70 N. Rajah, op. cit., 26 f.

71 H.A. Lamb, “Miscellaneous Papers”, op. cit., 34.

72 Ibid.; idem, in Malaya in History, IV, 2, 2–9; V, 1, 13–20; ibid., 2, 5–21; Chandi Bukit Batu Pahat (Singapore, 1960).

73 Treloar, F. E., “Chemical Analyses of Some Metal Objects from Chandi Bukit Batu Pahat, Kedah: Suggested Origin and Date”, J.M.B.R.A.S., XLI, 1, (1968), 193–198.Google Scholar

74 Stargardt, J., “The Extent and Limitations of Indian Influences in the Prehistoric Civilizations of the Malay Peninsula”, South Asian Archaeology, ed. Hammond, N., (London, 1973), p. 301.Google Scholar

75 Sullivan, M., “Excavations in Kedah and Province Wellesley”, J.M.B.R.A.S., XXXI, 1, (1958), 192–196.Google Scholar

76 Foong, S.T., “Recent Archaeological Discoveries in Malaya”, J.M.B.R.A.S., XXXII, 1, (1959), 209–213.Google Scholar

77 H. G. Quaritch Wales, “Archaeological Researches”, op. cit.

78 H. A. Lamb, “Miscellaneous Papers”, op. cit., 84.

79 N. Rajah, op. cit., 152–154.

80 See Low, J. in Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, XVII, 1, (1848), 232–4Google Scholar; XVII, 2, (1848), 62–6; XVIII, 1, (1849), 247–9.

81 See Kern, H., “Concerning Some Old Sanskrit Inscriptions in the Malay Peninsula”, J.M.B.R.A.S., XLIX, (1907), 95–101Google Scholar; Coedès, G., Recueil des Inscriptions du Siam, Part 2, (Bangkok, 1929), p. 14Google Scholar; R. C. Majumdar, Suvarnadvīpa, op. cit., p. 82 f.; P. Wheatley, op. cit., p. 274.

82 See Sastri, K.A.N., in J.M.B.R.A.S., vol. XXII, 1, (1949), 25–30.Google Scholar

83 H.G. Quaritch Wales, “A Newly Explored Route”, op. cit.

84 K.A.N. Sastri, op. cit., 30.

85 H.A. Lamb, “Takuapa: The Probable Site of a Pre-Malaccan Entrepôt in the Malay Peninsula”, Malayan and Indonesian Studies, eds. J. Bastin and R. Roolvink.

86 H. G. Q. Wales, “Archaeological Researches on Ancient Indian Colonies”, op. cit., 68 f. and idem, “Malayan Archaeology of the Hindu Period: Some Reconsiderations”, J.M.B.R.A.S., XLIII, 1, (1970), 1–34.Google Scholar

87 E.g. R. C. Majumdar, Hindu Colonies in the Far East, op. cit., p. 16.

88 H. A. Lamb, “Miscellaneous Papers”, op. cit., 78 f.; “A Note on a Small Inscribed Tablet from Dr. Wales’ Kedah Site No. 1”, F.M.J., n.s. VII, 67 f.

89 N. Rajah, op. cit., 86 f.

90 Ibid., 121 ff.

91 Vogel, J. P., “The Yūpa Inscriptions of King Mūlavarman from Koetei”, Bijdragen, LXXIV, (1918), 167–232.Google Scholar

92 R. C. Majumdar, op. cit., p. 126.

93 See SirBraddell, Roland, “Ancient Times in the Malay Peninsula”, J.M.B.R.A.S., XVII, 1, 172 ff.Google Scholar

94 Ibid., and see Vogel, J., “The Earliest Sanskrit Inscriptions of Java”, Publicaties van den Oudheidkundigen Dienst in Nederlandsch-Indie, I (1925), 15–35Google Scholar.

95 See Sir Roland Braddell, op. cit., XVII, 1, 172 ff.; Damais, L. C., “Les Ecritures d'Origine Indienne en Indonésie et dans le Sud-est Asiatique Continental”, B.S.E.I., XXX (1953), 365–382Google Scholar; Finot, L., “Notes d'Epigraphie”, B.E.F.E.O., II, (1902), 185–191Google Scholar.

96 See R.D. Hill, op. cit., 81.

97 W. Hankin, personal communication.

98 Wolters, O.W., “North-Western Cambodia in the Seventh Century”, B.S.O.A.S., XXXVII, 2, (1974), 355–384.Google Scholar

99 Lamb, H. A., “Early History”, Malaysia: A Survey, ed. Gungwu, Wang, (Melbourne, 1965), pp. 99–112Google Scholar; “Miscellaneous Papers”, op. cit., XI, 69–88.

100 See P. Wheatley, op. cit., pp. 177–209.

101 See R. C. Majumdar, Hindu Colonies, op. cit., p. 8.

102 Finot, L., “Les Origines de la Colonisation Indienne”, B.E.F.E.O., XII, 8, (1912), 1–4.Google Scholar

103 Jayaswal, K.P., A History of India, 150 A.D.–350 A.D. (Lahore, 1933), p. 156.Google Scholar

104 SirRaffles, Stamford, The History of Java, II (London, 2nd ed. 1930), 69 ff.Google Scholar

105 R. C. Majumdar, Hindu Colonies, op. cit., p. 12 f.

106 Wales, H.G.Q., in Indian Art and Letters, IX, 1, (1935), 1–31.Google Scholar

107 See G. Coedès, Les États hindouises, op. cit., p. 64.

108 See Filliozat, J., “Kailāśaparampara”, Felicitation Volumes of Southeast Asian Studies Presented to H. H. Prince Dhaninivat, II, (Bangkok, 1965), 241–247.Google Scholar

109 See Geertz, C., Person, Time and Conduct in Bali: An Essay in Cultural Analysis (New Haven, 1966)Google Scholar, and Mabbett, I. W., “Varṇas in Angkor and the Indian Caste System”, J.A.S., XXXVI, 3, (1977)Google Scholar, in press.

110 Mabbett, I. W., Truth, Myth and Politics in Ancient India (Delhi, 1972), pp. 41–53, 83–94.Google Scholar

111 J. C. van Leur, op. cit., p. 107.

112 Bosch, F.D.K., Selected Studies in Indonesian Archaeology (The Hague, 1961), pp. 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar, where a series of arguments is ranged against the kṣatriya and vaisya theories.

113 Stutterheim, W. F., Indian Influences in the Lands of the Pacific (Weltevreden, 1930), pp. 4 ff.Google Scholar

114 See also P. Wheatley, “Comment”, in K. S. Sandhu, op. cit., p. 98 f., n.239.

115 E.g. R.V. X.90, A.V. XI.5.17–20; Mbh, Śātiparvan 26.33–35.

116 G. Coedès, Les États hindouisés, op. cit., p. 57.

117 See Devahuti, D., India and Ancient Malaya (Singapore, 1965), p. 40.Google Scholar

118 LeMay, E. G. R. S., The Culture of Southeast Asia, the Heritage of India (London, 1954), pp. 115–117Google Scholar; Giteau, M., Khmer Sculpture and the Angkor Civilization (Farnborough, 1965), p. 30Google Scholar; Cp. Boisselier, J., La statuaire de Champa (Paris, 1963), p. 400.Google Scholar

119 E.g. P. Mus, op. cit., Brohm, J., “Buddhism and Animism in a Burmese Village”, J.A.S., XXII, 2, (1963), 155–167Google Scholar. Geertz, C., in The Religion of Java (Illinois, 1960Google Scholar), distinguishes the animistic, Hindu-Buddhist and orthodox Muslim traditions that live side by side under the mantle of Islam.

120 Coedès, G., “Some Problems in the Ancient History of the Hinduized States of Southeast Asia”, J.S.E.A.H., V, (1964), 1–14Google Scholar.

121 L. de la Vallee Poussin, Dynasties et histoire de l'lnde, p. 360; G. Coedès, Les États hindouisés, op. cit., p. 37 f.; S. Lévi, L'Inde Civilisatrice, p. 23.

122 On Sanskritization see Srivinas, M.N., op. cit., Religion and Society Among the Coorgs of South India (Oxford, 1952)Google Scholar; Caste in Modern India and Other Essays (Bombay, 1962).

123 Staal, J.F., “Sanskrit and Sanskritization”, J.A.S., XXII, (1963, 261–275Google Scholar).

124 Ibid., 265.

125 Ibid., 267.

126 Ibid., 268.

127 Ibid., 269.

128 Ibid., 269 f.

129 Raghavan, V., “Variety and Integration in the Pattern of Indian Culture”, Far Eastern Quarterly, XV, (1958), 497.Google Scholar

130 Marriott, M., “Little Communities in an Indigenous Civilization”, Village India, Studies in the Community, ed. Marriott, M., (Chicago, 1955Google Scholar).

131 Dumont, L. and Pocock, D., Contributions to Indian Sociology, I, (1957), 9, 15Google Scholar; III, (1959), 25, 45.

132 S. J. Tambiah, Buddhism and the Spirit Cults in North-East Thailand (London, 1970), pp. 367–377.

133 P. Mus, op. cit.; Maury, C., Folk Origins of Indian Art (New York, 1969Google Scholar).