Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 April 2011
Considering the importance of the early dates for bronze working technology in Southeast Asia that several of us have been presenting in preliminary reports over the last fifteen years, it is somewhat surprising that there have not been more critical articles published concerning our evidence and interpretation thereof. The primary reason for this is no doubt because final reports of the pertinent sites presenting the relevant data in context have not yet appeared. The great majority of the interested archaeologists are simply awaiting the final site reports before they decide whether our interpretation is reasonable. We are sorry for the great delay in completing the final reports. Speaking of Non Nok Tha, the first site from which excavated data produced early dates for bronze working, the descriptive portion of the research has been completed, the analysis of the data has almost been completed (primarily by Donn Bayard), and it is hoped that the first volume of a two volume final report can be submitted to the press by the end of 1982. The second volume will be totally a data volume, probably published in microfiche.
1 Solheim, W.G. II, “Early Bronze in Northeastern Thailand”, Silpākon 11/4 (Bangkok, 1967): 43–48Google Scholar (Engl.), 49–60 (Thai). Solheim, W.G. II, “Southeast Asia and the West”, Science 157/3791 (1967): 899Google ScholarPubMed. Solheim, W.G. II, “Early Bronze in Northeastern Thailand”, Current Anthropology 9/1 (1968): 59–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Marschall, W., “On the Stone Age of Indonesia”, Tribus 23 (Stuttgart, 1974): 71–90Google Scholar.
3 Solheim, Wilhelm G. II, “Review Article: The Stone Age of Indonesia by H.R. van Heekeren”, Asian Perspectives 18/2 (1975): 123–25.Google Scholar
4 Loofs-Wissowa, H.H.E., “Thermoluminescence Dates from Thailand: Comments”, Antiquity XLVIII/ 189 (1974): 58–62.Google Scholar
5 Loofs-Wissowa, H.H.E., “Report on an Archaeological Journey to the Socialist Republic of Vietnam”, Bulletin, Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association II (1980): 10.Google Scholar
6 Solheim, W.G. II, “New Data on late Southeast Asian Prehistory and their Interpretation”, Saeculum 31/3–4 (1980): 275–344, 409 (in German).Google Scholar
7 Solheim, W.G. II, “New data on late Southeast Asian prehistory and their Interpretation (excerpts)”, Journal of the Hong Kong Archaeological Society 8 (1979): 73–87Google Scholar. Solheim, W.G. II, “A Look at ‘L’ Art preboudhique de la Chine et de l'Asie du Sud-est et son influence en Oceanie' Forty Years After”, Asian Perspectives 22/2 (1979): 165–205Google Scholar.
8 Peacock, B.A.V., “The Later Prehistory of the Malay Peninsula”, in Early South East Asia, ed. Smith, R.B. and Watson, W. (New York and Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1979), p. 213.Google Scholar
9 Solheim, “Early Bronze”, Silpākon.
10 Solheim, “Early Bronze”, Current Anthropology.
11 Solheim, “Southeast Asia and the West”.
12 Solheim, “Early Bronze”, Silpākqn and Current Anthropology.
13 Solheim, “Early Bronze”, Current Anthropology.
14 Ibid., p. 62.
15 Solheim, “Southeast Asia and the West”, pp. 899–900.
16 Solheim, “A Look”, p. 196.
17 Bayard, D.T., “Excavation at Non Nok Tha, Northeastern Thailand, 1968: An Interim Report”, Asian Perspectives XIII (1970, publ. 1972): 109–143Google Scholar. Bayard, D.T., “The Chronology of Prehistoric Metallurgy in North-east Thailand: Silabhumi or Samrddhabhumi?”, in Early South East Asia, ed. Smith, R.B. and Watson, W. (New York and Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1979), pp. 15–32.Google Scholar
18 Bayard, “Interim Report”, pp. 19–20.
19 “Phuangsin Suwannart, “Report to the Director General, Fine Arts Department of Thailand, on the analysis of a metal axe found at Ban Na-di, northeastern Thailand” (1969).
20 Bronson, B. and Han, M., “A Thermoluminescence Series from Thailand”, Antiquity XLVI/184(1972): 322Google Scholar.
21 Gorman, C. and Charoenwongsa, Pisit, “Ban Chiang: A Mosaic of Impressions from the First Two Years” Expedition 18/4 (1976): 17Google Scholar.
22 Mortlock, Allan J. and Price, David M., “New Thermoluminescence dates from Ban Chiang in northeastern Thailand”, in proceedings of symposium “Application of Scientifically Derived Data in Archaeological and Historical Research” (Canberra: Australian National University, Nov. 1981)Google Scholar.
23 Mortlock, Allan J. and Price, David M., “A New Group of Ban Chiang Potsherds dated by thermoluminescence”, Journal of the Hong Kong Archaeological Society 9 (1980–81, publ. 1982).Google Scholar
24 Gorman and Pisit, “Mosaic of Impressions”.
25 Mortlock and Price, “A New Group”.
26 Gary W. Carriveau and Garman Harbottle, “Thermoluminescence Dating Problems with Ban Chiang Pottery” (submitted for publication, n.d.).
27 Solheim, “A Look”. Solheim, “New Data”, Saeculum.
28 Davidson, Jeremy H.C.S., “Recent Archaeological Activity in Viet-Nam”, Journal of the Hong Kong Archaeological Society 6 (1976): 80–99Google Scholar. Davidson, Jeremy H.C.S., “Archaeology in northern VietNam since 1954”, in Early South East Asia, ed. Smith, R.B. and Watson, W. (New York and Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1979), pp. 98–124Google Scholar. Solheim, “A Look”. Van, Trong, “New Knowledge on Dongson Culture from archaeological discoveries these twenty years”, in Recent Discoveries and New Views on Some Archaeological Problems in Vietnam (Hanoi: Institute of Archaeology, 1979), pp. 1–8Google Scholar.
29 Bronson and Han, “A Thermoluminescence Series”, p. 323.
30 Bayard, “Chronology”, p. 19.
31 Smith, R.B., “A Comment on the Non Nok Tha Dates”, in Early South East Asia, ed. Smith, R.B. and Watson, W. (New York and Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1979), pp. 39–41.Google Scholar