Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T19:46:23.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Development and Spread of Metallurgy in Southeast Asia: A Review of the Present Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2011

H.H.E. Loofs-Wissowa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Insignificant as it may seem, not only to the layman but also to professional scholars dealing with Southeast Asian affairs such as political scientists, economists, sociologists, and even historians, the Metal Age of Southeast Asia clearly is a force to reckon with, in the sense that it now seems to occupy everyone's mind in the various countries of the region just as much as contemporary issues do. The Metal Age, in other words, is linked with the present in Southeast Asia as nowhere else in the world, and has become a “contemporary issue” too.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 1983 , pp. 1 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

This paper was presented at the ASAA Conference, Brisbane, 1980.

1 As condensations of metallic vapours in clouds into objects which fell to earth when lightning struck.

2 van Heekeren, H.R., The Bronze-Iron Age of Indonesia (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1958), p. 12Google Scholar.

3 Hirth, F., “Uber hinterindische Bronze-Trommeln”, T'oung Pao 1 (1890): 137–42Google Scholar. Meyer, A.B., Alterthümer aus dem Ostindischen Archipel und angrenzenden Gebieten (Dresden: Königl. Ethn. Mus. zu Dresden, 4, 1884Google Scholar). Meyer, A.B., Bronze-Pauken aus Südostasien (Dresden, 1898)Google Scholar. Schmeltz, J.D.E., “Bronze-Pauken im Indischen Archipel”, Intern. Archiv f. Ethnographie IX (Ethnogr. Beiträge, 1896Google Scholar). Rouffaer, G.P., “Een paar aanvullingen over bronzen keteltrommen in Nederlandsch-Indie”, Bijdragen Kon. Inst. v. Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 51 (1900): 284–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar. de Groot, J.J.M., “Die antiken Bronze-Pauken im ostindischen Archipel und auf dem Festland von Südostasien”, Mitt. Sem. f. orient. Sprachen Berlin, Ostasiatische Stud (1901): 76–113Google Scholar. Herger, F., Alte Metalltrommeln aus Sudost-Asien (Leipzig, 1902)Google Scholar, Hirth, F., “Chinesische Ansichten über Bronzetrommeln”, Mitt. Sem. f. orient. Sprachen Berlin VII/1 (1904).Google Scholar

4 Parmentier, H., “Anciens tambours de bronze”, Bull. École Française d'Extrême-Orient XVIII (1918): 17Google Scholar.

5 Goloubew, V., “L'Age du Bronze au Tonkin et dans le Nord-Annam”, Bull. École Française d'Extrême-Orient XXIX (1929): 1–46Google Scholar.

6 Heine-Geldern, R., “Das Tocharerproblem und die Pontische Wanderung”, Saeculum II/2 (1951): 225–55.Google Scholar

7 Peacock, B.A.V., “A Preliminary Note on the Dong-Son Bronze Drums from Kampong Sungai Lang”, Federation Museums Journal IX (1964): 1–3Google Scholar. Peacock, B.A.V., “The Drums at Kampong Sungai Lang”, Malaya in History X/1 (1965): 3–15Google Scholar.

8 Solheim, W.G. II, “Early Bronze in Northeastern Thailand”, Silpākon 11/4 (Bangkok, 1967): 43–48 (Engl.)Google Scholar, 49–60 (Thai). Solheim, W.G., “Early Bronze in Northeastern Thailand”, Current Anthropology 9/1 (1968): 59–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Parker, R.H., “Continuity and Change in Two Areas of North East Thailand”, in The Diffusion of Material Culture, ed. Loofs-Wissowa, H.H.E. (Honolulu: Social Science Research Institute, Asian and Pacific Archaeology Series, 1980)Google Scholar.

10 Solheim, “Early Bronze” (1968), p. 60.

11 Ibid., p. 59.

12 Bayard, D.T., “Excavation at Non Nok Tha, Northeastern Thailand, 1968: An Interim Report”, Asian Perspectives XIII (1970, publ. 1972): 115Google Scholar. Bayard, D.T., Non Nok Tha: The 1968 Excavation; Procedure, Stratigraphy, and a Summary of the Evidence (Dunedin: University of Otago, Studies in Prehistoric Anthropology 4, 1971), p. 5Google Scholar.

13 See section drawings in Bayard, “Excavation at Non Nok Tha”, pp. 112–13, and Non Nok Tha: The 1968 Excavation, figs. 2 & 3.

14 Bayard, D.T., “Early Thai Bronze: Analysis and New Dates”, Science 176 (1972): 1412CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. Bayard, D.T., “The Chronology of Prehistoric Metallurgy in North-east Thailand: Silabhumi or Samrddhabhumi?”, in Early South East Asia: Essays in Archaeology, History and Historical Geography, ed. Smith, R.B. & Watson, W. (New York and Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1979), p. 27Google Scholar.

15 Loofs, H.H.E., “Thermoluminescence Dates from Thailand: Comments”, Antiquity XLVIII/189 (1974): 58–62Google Scholar.

16 Bayard, “Chronology”, p. 31.

17 Solheim, “Early Bronze” (1968), p. 61.

18 Solheim, W.G. II, “Reworking Southeast Asian Prehistory”, Paideuma XV (1969): 135Google Scholar.

19 Solheim, W.G. II, “New light on a Forgotten Past”, National Geographic 139/3 (1971): 335Google Scholar.

20 Solheim, W.G. II, “An Earlier Agricultural Revolution”, Scientific American 226/4 (1972): 36CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Forbes, R.J., Studies in Ancient Technology VIII, 2nd rev. ed. (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1971) p. 2.Google Scholar

22 Ibid.

23 Selimchanov, I.R., “Zu einigen aktuellen Problemen der ältesten Metallurgie”, in Moderne Probleme der Archäologie, ed. Otto, K.-H. & Brachman, H.-J. (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1975), p. 185Google Scholar.

24 Selimchanov, pers. comm.

25 I.R. Selimchanov, “The Chemical Characteristics of some Metal Finds from Non Nok Tha”, in Smith & Watson, Early South East Asia, p. 37.

26 Marschall, W., “On the Stone Age of Indonesia”, Tribus 23 (Stuttgart, 1974): 82Google Scholar.

27 Bayard, “Excavation at Non Nok Tha”, p. 123.

28 Bayard, Non Nok Tha: The 1968 Excavation, p. 16.

29 Bayard, “Early Thai Bronze”, p. 1411 (emphasis added).

30 Ibid.

31 Bayard, “Excavations at Non Nok Tha”, p. 123.

32 Bayard, “Early Thai Bronze”, p. 1411.

33 Bayard, “Excavations at Non Nok Tha”, pp. 123–24.

34 Alsop, J., “Thai Pots may Help Rewrite Human Story”, Los Angeles Times (7 Sept. 1975): 1, 4Google Scholar. Honan, W.H., “The Case of the Hot Pots: An Archaeological Thriller”, New York Times Magazines (8 June 1975): 14–15, 59–65.Google Scholar

35 Gorman, C. & Charoenwongsa, Pisit, “Ban Chiang: A Mosaic of Impressions from the First Two Years”, Expedition 18/4 (1976): 26Google Scholar.

36 Pisit Charoenwongsa, pers. comm.

37 Muhly, J.D., “Introduction”, Expedition 18/4 (1976): 11.Google Scholar

38 Marschall, “On the Stone Age of Indonesia”, pp. 82–83.