Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T11:42:01.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Asia - Constitutional Systems in Late Twentieth Century Asia. Edited by Lawrence W. Beer. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1992. Pp. ix, 740. Index.

Review products

Constitutional Systems in Late Twentieth Century Asia. Edited by Lawrence W. Beer. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1992. Pp. ix, 740. Index.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Kevin Y.L. Tan
Kevin Y.L. Tan
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews: General
Information
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , September 1993 , pp. 378 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The first volume was Constitutionalism in Asia: Asian Views of the American Influence (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979)Google Scholar.

2 The countries included in the study are the People's Republic of China, The Republic of China (Taiwan), Japan, North and South Korea, Vietnam, Brunei, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand.

3 These include separation of power, judicial independence, free and regular elections, restraints on the power of the military, property rights and economic freedom, freedom of expression and right of silence, legal tolerance for expression of personal and group beliefs, respect for desires for self-governance, procedural rights in criminal and civil cases, and acceptance of the constitution and human rights as supreme law.