Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-27T19:56:37.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

British Expansion in Malaya, 1897–19021

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Ira Klein
Get access

Extract

Was British expansion in Malaya the unitary expression of an implacable imperialism, in which gradually but inexorably British economic and political enterprise gained indirect hegemony and then unequivocal rule; in which, by friendship and guile, power and diplomacy, Malay chiefs and populace were controlled, Siamese authority negated, and European rivals bested? There was at Whitehall a steady interest in the late nineteenth century by Salisbury, Balfour, Chamberlain and others in furthering British control in Malaya. But the strategy of expansion, ardently pushed by Straits Settlements officials during the period of ‘High Imperialism’ in the late nineteenth century was checked by other imperatives of British imperialism in Asia. The British were reluctant to take any step in Malaya which, by offending and weakening the Siamese, would encourage French expansion in eastern Siam. Further, the Indian Government, the trustee of British military power in Asia, was unwilling to commit large resources to Southeast Asia which might have been required to combat Russia on India's northwest threshold. These factors limited a British forward movement in Malaya. At times, however, British expansionary fervour did burst stridently upon Malays and Siamese. In 1902 the British wrested concessions from Siam which allowed the placement of British ‘advisers’ in Kelantan and Trengganu, and by which Siam abandoned all prerogatives of interfering with these states' internal affairs. This study is directed to comprehension of the strategy of British expansion in Malaya, particularly of British efforts to sequester control of economic concessions and privileges in Kelantan and Trengganu, and the significance of these manoeuvres in preparing for the transfer of Kelantan, Trengganu, Kedah and Perlis from Siam to Britain in March, 1909.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Southeast Asian History , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 1968 , pp. 53 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2. See for example British Foreign Office Confidential Series, Siam (Public Record Office), FO 422, vol. 9, Salisbury to Prince Nares, August 22, 1885; India Political and Secret Home Correspondence (India Office Library), vol. 77, Memo, from Ernest Satow, June 30, 1885. See also Satow Papers (Public Record Office), Weld-Satow Correspondence, 1884–87.

3. Rosebery Papers (Scottish National Library), Rosebery to Kimberley, November 3, 1894. I would like to thank Miss Elspeth Yeo of the Scottish National Library for her help in enabling me to rapidly view this collection.

4. Cowan, C. D., Nineteenth Century Malaya (London: Oxford University Press, 1961) p. 10.Google Scholar

5. Cowan, , Nineteenth Century Malaya, p. 168–169.Google Scholar

Winstedt, R. O., Britain and Malaya, 1786 – 1948 (London: Longman's, Green & Co., 1944) p. 27.Google Scholar

6. FO 422, vol. 8, Weld, to Kimberley, , 06 3, 1882Google Scholar; FO 422, vol. 8, Low to Colonial Secretary, April 29, 1882.

7. FO 422, vol. 56, Archer, to Lansdowne, , 09 29, 1902.Google Scholar

8. Elgin Papers (India Office Library), vol. 66, Elgin to Fryer, May 17, 1895.

9. Balfour Papers (British Museum), Balfour, to Barrington, , 01 28, 1896.Google Scholar

10. Rosebery Papers, Kimberley, to Rosebery, , 06 12, 1895.Google Scholar

11. FO 422, vol. 47, Convention between Great Britain and Siam, April 6, 1897.

12. India PSH Corn, Memo from. … Satow.

13. Archer warned of ‘some Malay chief’ refusing to acknowledge Siamese oyei-lordship or control, thereby giving a ‘European power’ excuse for intervention. He insisted that Siam was too weak to effect its claim in south Malaya. Salisbury was insufficiently informed, or concerned to attempt to primarily achieve iron-clad strategic safeguards on the Peninsula. Although his private correspondence reveals a superb understanding of strategic considerations, it also shows a vein of pessimism regarding the perfect protection of British interests against the powerful combinations of European powers that could allign against them. See for example, Salisbury Papers (Christ Church, Oxford), Salisbury to White Sept. 30, 1885 (vol. A44); Salisbury to Morier, Feb. 5. 1892 (vol. A74); Salisbury to Lascelles, Oct. 6, 1897 (vol. A71). For Archer's views, see FO 422, vol. 45, CO to FO, Feb. 28, 1896.

14. FO 422, vol. 51, Memo, by SirSwettenham, Frank, 01 5, 1899.Google Scholar

15. FO 422, vol. 51, Greville, to Salisbury, , 02 26, 1899.Google Scholar

16. FO 422, vol. 51, Greville, to Salisbury, , 03 16, 1899.Google Scholar

17. FO 422, vol. 56, Duff, to Chamberlain, , 12 23, 1901.Google Scholar

18. FO 422, vol. 51, Greville, to Salisbury, , 08 19, 1899.Google Scholar

19. FO 422, vol. 56, Memo on the Relations between Siam and the Siamese Malay States of Kelantan and Trengganu, by SriSahadheb, Phya, 09 17, 1902.Google Scholar

20. Ibid.

21. FO 422, vol. 51, Scott, to Greville, , 08 5, 1899.Google Scholar

22. FO 422, vol. 56, Inclosure No. 2, in Clifford to Colonial Office, September 23, 1902.

23. FO 422, vol. 56, Abdul Kadir Kamarsedin to Governor F. Swettenham, Aug 13, 1901.

24. India PSH Corr., Memo, from … Satow.

25. FO 422, vol. 45, CO to FO, Feb. 28, 1896.

26. Joseph Chamberlain Papers (Birmingham University Library), Lansdowne, to Chamberlain, , 08 23, 1902.Google Scholar

27. FO 422, vol. 56, Memo, by Swettenham, , 05 23, 1902.Google Scholar

28. Ibid.

29. FO 422, vol. 56, Lansdowne, to Tower, , 01 7, 1902.Google Scholar

30. Ibid.

31. FO 422, vol. 56, Tower, to Lansdown, , 01 27, 1902.Google Scholar

32. Ibid.

33. FO 422, vol. 56, Swettenham, to CO, 06 11, 1902.Google Scholar

34. Consular and Embassy Archives, Bangkok (Public Record Office), FO 628. Swettenham's Promemoria of Conversations with the King of Siam, Feb. 24, 1902.

35. FO 628, Swettenham's Promemoria of Conversations … Feb. 25, 1902.

36. FO 422, vol. 56, Tower, to Lansdowne, , 03 8, 1902.Google Scholar

37. FO 422, vol. 56, Rajah of Legeh, to Swettenham, , 02 26, 1902.Google Scholar

38. Joseph Chamberlain Papers, Swettenham, to Chamberlain, , 04 17, 1902.Google Scholar

39. Joseph Chamberlain Papers, Swettenham, to Chamberlain, , 07 15, 1902.Google Scholar

40. Ibid.

41. Joseph Chamberlain Papers, Lansdown, to Chamberlain, , 08 27, 1902.Google Scholar

42. Joseph Chamberlain Papers, Chamberlain, to Swettenham, , 09 15, 1902.Google Scholar

43. FO 422, vol. 56, CO to FO, July 15, 1902.

44. FO 422,.vol. 56, Memo, by SirBertie, F., 09 8, 1902.Google Scholar

45. Winstedt, R. O., A History of Malaya (Singapore: Marican and Sons; rev. ed., 1962) pp. 236–237.Google Scholar

46. Lansdowne Papers, (Public Record Office), Verney, to Lansdowne, , 06 3, 1902.Google Scholar

47. FO 422, vol. 64, Paget, to Grey, , 01 15, 1909.Google Scholar