Article contents
National and International Dimensions of Indonesian History
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 August 2009
Extract
Among the more noteworthy features of the Indonesian government's current efforts to recover and accentuate what is believed to be the nation's “cultural identity” is the encouragement being given to the shift in emphasis in the writing of Indonesian history so as to bring out more fully the uniqueness and greatness of the Indonesian cultural achievement. This new “Indonesia-centric” approach is said to provide a much needed correction of the earlier, colonially oriented and “Western centric” type of historical writing about Indonesia, in which the Indonesian “identity” allegedly was obscured because of Western and Dutch ethnocentric prejudices, arid in which historical events in Indonesia were treated as mere appendages to Dutch or European history generally. As early as December, 1957, a seminar of historians in Djokjakarta, Central Java, was convened “in order to eliminate the colonial historian's presentation and restore the proper emphasis on the indigenous culture, tradition and history” in “the history books of the country”. More than five years later the problem still appeared not to have been resolved as yet, for at another historical seminar held in Medan, North Sumatra, in March, 1963, Indonesia's Deputy First Minister for Information, Ruslan Abdulgani, was reportedly still calling “on Indonesian writers to begin to ‘rewrite’ Indonesian history to cleanse it of what he called ‘West-centrism’”. Indonesian historians, Abdulgani urged, “must dare to rewrite our history so that it will no longer be West-centric but Indonesiacentric”.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The National University of Singapore 1965
References
1. Antara Daily News Bulletin, 08 12, 1957.Google Scholar
2. Ibid., April 3, 1963.
3. van der Kroef, Justus M., “On the Writing of Indonesian History”, Pacific Affairs, 12, 1958, pp. 352–371.Google Scholar
4. Indonesian Observer (Djakarta), 03 25, 1963.Google Scholar
5. Antara Daily News Bulletin, 04 3, 1963.Google Scholar
6. Of Berg's voluminous writings on this subject I mention here only his essays “De Zin der Tweede Babad-Tanah-Jawi”, Indonesia, vol. 8 (1955), esp. pp. 361–367, 394–395Google Scholar and “Gedachtemvisseling over Javanese Geschiedschrijving”, Indonesië, vol. 9 (1956), pp. 177–216Google Scholar. Berg has his critics, but no one has successfully refuted his tlieorv of the “optative” character of the old Javanese historical writings.
7. See e.g. Alatas, Syed Hussein, “On the Need for an Historical Study of Malaysian Islamization”, Journal of Southeast Asian History vol. 4 (1963), esp. pp. 67–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Drewes, G.W.J., “Mysticism and Activism”, p. 286Google Scholar in von Grünebaum, G.E., ed., Unity and Variety in Muslim Civilization (Chicago, 1955).Google Scholar
9. Bosch, F.D.K., “Uit de Grensgebieden tussen Indische invloedssfeer en Oudinheems Volksgeloof op Java”, Bijdragen tot de Taal-Land-en Volkenkunde Uitgegeven door het Koninklijk Instituut voor de Taal-Land-en Volkenkunde, vol. 110 (1954), p. 13.Google Scholar
10. Geldern, R. Heine, “Le Pays de P'ikien, le Roi au Grand Cou et le Singa Mangaradja”, Bulletin de l'Ecole Française d'Extreme-Orient, vol. 49 (1959), p. 385.Google Scholar
11. Geldren, R. Heine, “Survivance de motifs de l'ancien art bouddhique de l'Inde dans l'ile de Nias”, Artibus Asiae, vol. 24 (1961), pp. 299–306.Google Scholar
12. Wolters, O.W., “The Po-ssu Pine Trees”, Bulletin, School of Oriental and African Studies, vol. 23 (1960), pp. 323–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and de Casparis, J.G., “New Evidence on Cultural Relations between Java and Cevlon in Ancient Times”, Artibus Asiae, vol. 24 (1961), pp. 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Johns, A.H., “Malay Sufism”, Journal of the Malayan Branch, Royal Asiatic Society, vol. 30, Part 2, (08, 1957), pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
14. See, e.g., Duyvendak, J.P., Inleiding tot de Ethnologie van den Indischen Arcliipel (3rd ed., Grongingen, Djakarta, 1946)Google Scholar, and de Jong, J., Het Geestesleven der Volken van Indonesië (Groningcn Djakarta, 1948).Google Scholar
15. Cf. van Nieuwenhuijze, C.A.O., Shamsu'l-Din van Pasai (Diss., Leyden, 1945).Google Scholar
16. See by van der Kroef, J.M.: “Dualism and Symbolic Antithesis in Indonesian Society”, American Anthropologist, vol. 56 (1954), pp. 847–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar; “The Indonesian Idea of God”, The Journal of Religious Thought, vol. 14 (1956–1957), pp. 43–54Google Scholar; and “El Elemento Monistico en el Pensamiento Indonesio”, Revista Mexicana de Sociologia, vol. 24 (1962), pp. 497–520, and the literature there cited.Google Scholar
17. Zoetmulder, P.J., Pantheisme en Monisme in de Javaansche Soeloek Literatuur (Dissertation, Leyden: Nimwegen, 1935), pp. 254–255.Google Scholar
18. Hidding, K.A.H., “Het Wonder in de Structuur van hct Javaansche Denken”, Tijdschrift voor Indische Taal-Land-en Volkenkunde uitgegeven door het Koninklijk Bataviaasch Genootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschappen, vol. 75 (1935), p. 119.Google Scholar
19. Tirtakusuma, R. Soedana, “Een nieuwe Wajang-soort, de ‘wayang dobél’ van Amat Kasman van Kelor”, Djawa, vol. 14 (1934), pp. 117–120.Google Scholar
20. Soemowidagdo, R. Soemadi, “Cultural Revision in Indonesia”, Madjalah Geograft Indonesia (edisi Inggeris), vol. 1 (09, 1960), no. 1, p. 28.Google Scholar
21. Drewes, , op.cit., p. 298.Google Scholar
22. Hurgronje, C. Snouck, Verspreide Geschriften (Bonn, Leipzig, The Hague, 1924), IV, reeks 1, p. 147Google Scholar (“Brieven van een Wertono pension”). The title hadji is given to him who has completed the pilgrimage to Mecca, one of the required “Five Pillars” of the Islamic faith.
23. Ali, R. Mohammad. Perdjuangan Feodal (Bandung, 1954).Google Scholar
24. Tiro, Hasan Muhammad, Demokrasi Untuk Indonesia (Penerbit Sculawan, Acheh, 1959).Google Scholar
25. Bruner, Edward M., “Urbanization and Ethnic Identity in North Sumatra”, American Anthropologist, vol. 63 (1961), pp. 512–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Political Manifesto, Republic of Indonesia, of 17th August, 1959 (Department of Information, Republic of Indonesia, Djakarta, 1959), p. 62Google Scholar. There is no need to ask who the nation's sesepuh or elder, to which Sukarno referred, is. On March 26, 1963, the Indonesian Governors Conference bestowed on Sukarno the title Sesepuh Agung Pemerintahan Republik Indonesia or “Supreme Elder of the Government of the Indonesian Republic”. Indonesian Observer (Djakarta), 03 27, 1963.Google Scholar
27. Generally representative of this theme is a work like Mohammad Yamin's 6000 Tahun Sang Merah Putih (Djakarta, 1958).Google Scholar
28. Cf. van der Kroef, J.M., Indonesian Social Evolution. Some Psychological Considerations (Amsterdam. 1958).Google Scholar
29. Marlaux, André, “On St. Just”, Partisan Review (New York), Fall, 1955, p. 471.Google Scholar
30. Not least of the distortions to which the “Indonesia centric” position is apt to lead is the notion of relative cultural “equality”. Thus it was one of van Leur's principal contentions that the form, structure and technical process of Asian and European trade were equally advanced in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, and that, for example, the latter exhibited no organizational superiority over the former. Suggestive queries casting doubt on van Leur's contention appear in Meilink-Roelofsz, M.A.P., Asian Trade and European Influence in the Indoesian Archipelago between 1500 and about 1630 (The Hague, 1962), pp. 8–10.Google Scholar
31. Geyl, Pieter, Encounters in History (Cleveland and New York, Meridian Books edition, 1961), p. 285Google Scholar (“The Vitality of Western Civilization”, 1959).
32. Sudjatmoko, , An Approach to Indonesian History: Towards an Open Future (Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., 1960), pp. 10–11.Google Scholar
33. Ibid., p. 18.
- 2
- Cited by