Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:47:37.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Value problems of Welfare-Capitalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

T. H. Marshall
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I have borrowed this term from Richard Crossman. When he wrote his contribution to the New Fabian Essays in 1952 he took stock of the present state of socialism, as the original Fabians had done in 1889. He hoped to discover ‘a philosophy of Socialism’ with life in it. But he failed. An obvious place to look for it was in the Welfare State, as it had emerged from the hands of the post-war Labour government. But the Welfare State, he decided, was not socialist; it was ‘the climax of a long process, in the course of which capitalism had been civilised and to a large extent reconciled with democracy’. Later on he referred to the product of this process as ‘welfare capitalism’. He ought to have called it ‘democratic-welfare-capitalism’ because, as I shall argue, democracy deserves to have a position as a third party of independent status, not just to be taken for granted.

Type
Special Issue on ‘Values in Social Policy’
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , January 1972 , pp. 15 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Crossman, R. H. (ed.), New Fabian Essays, London: The Turnstile Press, 1952, pp. 6 and 25.Google Scholar

2 Durbin, E. F. M., The Politics of Democratic Socialism, London: Routledge, 1940Google Scholar; the comment by R. H. Tawney was on the dust cover.

3 Loc. cit. p. 271.

4 Schumpeter, Joseph A., Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, London: Allen and Unwin, 1947, especially pp. 296–302.Google Scholar

5 Tingsten, Herbert, ‘Stability and Vitality in Swedish Democracy’, Political Quarterly, 26, no. 2, 1955, p. 141.Google Scholar

6 Durbin, op. cit. p. 298.

7 Gaitskell, Hugh, Socialism and Nationalisation, Fabian Tract 300, London: The Fabian Society, 1956, pp. 3–4.Google Scholar

8 Crosland, C. A. R., Future of the Left, Encounter Pamphlets no. 4, 03 1960, p. 7.Google Scholar

9 Myrdal, Gunnar, Beyond the Welfare State, London: Duckworth, 1960, p. 53.Google Scholar

10 Wilensky, Harold L. and Lebaux, Charles N., Industrial Society and Social Welfare, Introduction to 1965 edition, New York: The Free Press, p. xvii.Google Scholar

11 The New York Times, 4 June 1969.

12 The Times, 25 January 1971.

13 E.g. Macleod, Iain and Powell, J. Enoch, The Social Services – Needs and Means, 1952.Google Scholar

14 Arrow, Kenneth, Social Choice and Individual Values, London: Chapman and Hall, 1951, pp. 1 and 3.Google Scholar

15 Samuelsson, Kurt, From Great Power to Welfare State, London: Allen and Unwin, 1968, p. 272.Google Scholar

16 Bell, Daniel, The End of Ideology, Illinois: The Free Press, 1960, p. 375.Google Scholar

17 Dahrendorf, Ralf, Gesellschaft und Freiheit, Munich: Piper, 1964, p. 238.Google Scholar

18 Beyond the Welfare State, op. cit., p. 67.

19 Rein, Martin, Social Policy: Issues of Choice and Change, New York: Random House, 1970, p. 10.Google Scholar

20 Quoted in Reid, G. L. and Robertson, D. J., Fringe Benefits, Labour Costs and Social Security, London: Allen and Unwin, 1965, p. 189.Google Scholar

21 Quoted in Page, Alfred N., Utility Theory: a Book of Readings, New York: Wiley, 1968, p. 123.Google Scholar

22 The Times, 3 March 1971, Leading Article.

23 Colquhoun, Patrick, A Treatise on Indigence, London: Hatchard, 1806, pp. 7–8.Google Scholar

24 Shils, E. A., ‘The End of Ideology’, Encounter, vol. 5, 11 1955, p. 57.Google Scholar