Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:08:14.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Decades of Change in Europe: The Emergence of the Social Investment State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2012

KEES VAN KERSBERGEN  and
ANTON HEMERIJCK
KEES VAN KERSBERGEN
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Department of Political Science and Government, Building 1331 Bartholins Allé 7 DK-8000 Århus CDenmark email: [email protected]
ANTON HEMERIJCK
Affiliation:
Faculty of Social Sciences, VU University, De Boelelaan 1081 - z116, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since the late 1970s, the developed welfare states of the European Union have been recasting the policy mix on which their systems of social protection were built. They have adopted a new policy orthodoxy that could be summarised as the ‘social investment strategy’. Here we trace its origins and major developments. The shift is characterised by a move away from passive transfers and towards the maximalisation of employability and employment, but there are significant national distinctions and regime specific trajectories. We discuss some caveats, focusing on the question whether the new policy paradigm has been established at the expense of social policies that mitigate poverty and inequality.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , July 2012 , pp. 475 - 492
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albrechtsen, H. (2004), ‘Active young people in Europe’, in Pascual, A. S. (ed.), Are Activation Policies Converging in Europe? The European Employment Strategy for Young People, Brussels: ETUI, pp. 197–252.Google Scholar
Armingeon, K. and Bonoli, G. (2006), The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States: Adapting Post-War Social Policies to New Social Risks, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Auer, P. (2010), ‘What's in a name? The rise (and fall?) of flexicurity’, Journal of Industrial Relations, 52: 3, 371–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bönker, F. and Wollman, H. (1996), ‘Incrementalism and reform waves: the case of social service reform in the Federal Republic of Germany’, Journal of European Public Policy, 3: 3, 441–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2007), ‘Time matters: postindustrialization, new social risks, and welfare state adaptation in advanced industrial democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 40: 5, 495–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2009), ‘Varieties of social investment in labour market policy’, in Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (eds.), What Future for Social Investment?, Stockholm: Institute for Future Studies, pp. 55–66.Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. and Palier, B. (2007), ‘When past reforms open new opportunities: comparing old age insurance reforms in Bismarckian welfare systems’, Social Policy and Administration, 41: 6, 555–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandolini, A. and Smeeding, T. M. (2009), ‘Income inequality in richer and OECD countries’, in Salverda, W., Nolan, B. and Smeeding, T. M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 71–100.Google Scholar
Brücker, H. and Konle-Seidl, R. (2006), ‘Kombilöhne im internationalen Vergleich: Nicht jede Therapie schlägt überall an’, IAB-Kurzbericht, 10 (8.6.2006), 1–8.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. L. and Hall, J. A. (2006), ‘Introduction: the state of Denmark’, in Campbell, J. L. and Hall, J. A. (eds.), National Identity and the Varieties of Capitalism: The Danish Experience, Montreal: McGill University Press, pp. 3–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G. L. and Whiteside, N. (2003), Pension Security in the 21st Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clasen, J. (2005), Reforming European Welfare States: Germany and the United Kingdom Compared, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingeldey, I. (2005), ‘Welfare state transformation between workfare and an enabling state: a comparative analysis’, TranState Working Papers, No. 21, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State, University of Bremen.Google Scholar
Ellison, N. (2006), The Transformation of Welfare States?, London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmenegger, P., Häusermann, S., Palier, B. and Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (eds.) (2012), The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality of Deindustrializing Societies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (ed.) (1996), Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (2009), The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women's New Roles, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. and Myles, J. (2009), ‘Economic inequality and the welfare state’, in Salverda, W., Nolan, B. and Smeeding, T. M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 639–64.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2011a), ‘Employment rate by gender, age group 15–64’, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=tsiem010 (accessed: 31 May 2011).Google Scholar
Eurostat (2011b), ‘Average exit age from the labour force by gender’, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/refreshTableAction.do?tab=table&plugin=1&pcode=tsiem030&language=en (accessed 31 May 2011).Google Scholar
Fajertag, G. and Pochet, P. (2000), Social Pacts in Europe: New Dynamics, Brussels: ETUI.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. and Gualmini, E. (2000), ‘Italy: rescue from without?’, in Scharpf, F. W. and Schmidt, V. A. (eds.), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, Vol. II: Diverse Responses to Common Challenges, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 351–98.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. and Hemerijck, A. (2003), ‘Recalibrating Europe's welfare regimes’, in Zeitlin, J. and Trubek, D. M. (eds.), Governing Work and Welfare in the New Economy: European and American Experiments, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 88–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazier, B. (2008), ‘Flexicurité et marchés transitionnels du travail: esquisse d'une réflexion normative’, Travail et Emploi, No. 113 (January–March), 117–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazier, B. (2009), ‘The European employment strategy in the tempest: restoring a long-term perspective’, in Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (eds.), What Future for Social Investment? Institute for Future Studies Research Report, Stockholm: Institute for Future Studies, pp. 153–64.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N. (2004), Transformation of the Welfare State: The Silent Surrender of Public Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hakim, C. (2003), Work−Lifestyle Choices in the Twenty-First Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Häusermann, S. (2010), The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe: Modernization in Hard Times, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemerijck, A. (2002), ‘The self-transformation of the European social model(s)’, in Esping-Andersen, G., Gallie, D., Hemerijck, A. and Myles, J. (eds.), Why We Need a New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 173–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemerijck, A. (2003), ‘Vier kernvragen van beleid’, Beleid en Maatschappij, 30: 1, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemerijck, A. and Schludi, M. (2000), ‘Sequences of policy failures and effective policy responses’, in Scharpf, F. W. and Schmidt, V. A. (eds.), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, Vol. I: From Vulnerability to Competitiveness, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 125–228.Google Scholar
Hemerijck, A., Knapen, B. and van Doorne, E. (2009), Aftershocks: Economic Crisis and Institutional Choice, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, J., Sefton, T. and Stewart, K. (eds.) (2009), Towards a More Equal Society? Poverty, Inequality and Policy since 1997, Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, E. and Stephens, J. D. (2001), Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies Global Markets, London and Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immergut, E., Anderson, K. and Schulze, I. (eds.) (2007), The Oxford Handbook of West European Pension Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenson, J. (2006), ‘The European social model: gender and generational equality’, in Giddens, A., Diamond, P. and Liddle, R. (eds.), Global Europe, Social Europe, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 151–71.Google Scholar
Jenson, J. (2009), ‘Redesigning citizenship regimes after neoliberalism: moving towards social investment’, in Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (eds.), What Future for Social Investment? Stockholm: Institute for Future Studies, pp. 27–44.Google Scholar
Kvist, J., Pedersen, L. and Köhler, P. (2008), ‘Making all persons work: modern active labour market policies’, in Eichhorst, W., Kaufmann, O. and Konle-Seidl, R. (eds.), Bringing the Jobless into Work? Experiences with Activation Schemes in Europe and the US, Berlin: Springer, pp. 221–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibfried, S. and Mau, S. (2008), Welfare States: Construction, Deconstruction, Reconstruction, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, P. K. (2006), ‘How can it possibly fly? The paradox of a dynamic labour market in a Scandinavian welfare state’, in Campbell, J. L., Hall, J. A. and Pedersen, O. K. (eds.), National Identity and Varieties of Capitalism: The Case of Denmark, Montreal: McGill University Press, pp. 321–55.Google Scholar
Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (2009), What Future for Social Investment?, Stockholm: Institute for Future Studies.Google Scholar
Morgan, K. (2009), ‘Child care and the social investment model: political conditions for reform’, in Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (eds.), What Future for Social Investment?, Stockholm: Institute for Future Studies, pp. 45–54.Google Scholar
Nachtwey, O. and Heise, A. (2006), ‘Großbritannien: Vom kranken Mann Europas zum Wirtschaftswunderland?’, WSI-Mitteilungen, 3: 131–7.Google Scholar
Obinger, H. and Starke, P. (2007), ‘Sozialpolitische Entwicklungstrends in OECD-Ländern 1980–2001: Konvergenz, Divergenz oder Persistenz?’, special issue ‘Transfer, Diffusion und Konvergenz von Politiken’, edited by Holzinger, K., Jörgens, H. and Knill, C., Politische Vierteljahresschrift, pp. 470–95.Google Scholar
OECD (2008), Growing Unequal? Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (2010), Employment Outlook 2010: Moving beyond the Jobs Crisis, Paris: OECD, http://www.oecd.org/document/22/0,3746,en_2649_33927_43221014_1_1_1_1,00.html#taxes.Google Scholar
Orloff, A. S. (2006), ‘From maternalism to “Employment for All”: state policies to promote women's employment across the affluent democracies’, in Levy, J. (ed.), The State after Statism: New State Activities in the Era of Globalization and Liberalization, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 230–68.Google Scholar
Page, R. and Hillage, J. (2006), ‘Vocational education and training in the UK’, Discussion Paper, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin fur Socialforschung, January 2006.Google Scholar
Palier, B. (ed.) (2010), A Long Goodbye to Bismarck? The Politics of Welfare Reform in Continental Europe, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (ed.) (2001), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauch, A. and Dornette, J. (2010), ‘Equal rights and equal duties? Activating labour market policy and the participation of long-term unemployed people with disabilities after the reform of the German welfare state’, Journal of Social Policy, 39: 1, 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryner, M. (2007), ‘The Nordic model: does it exist? Can it survive?’, New Political Economy, 12: 1, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. and Schmidt, V. A. (2000), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, 2 Volumes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Starke, P. (2008), Radical Welfare State Retrenchment: A Comparative Analysis, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiller, S. (2010), Ideational Leadership in German Welfare State Reform, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Van Berkel, R. (2010), ‘The provision of income protection and activation services for the unemployed in “active” welfare states: an international comparison’, Journal of Social Policy, 39: 1, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Kersbergen, K. (1995), Social Capitalism: A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State, London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vis, B. (2010), Politics of Risk-Taking: Welfare State Reform in Advanced Democracies, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vis, B. and van Kersbergen, K. (2011), ‘To what extent did the financial crisis intensify the pressure to reform the welfare state?’, Social Policy and Administration, 45: 4, 338–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, J. and Hemerijck, A. (1997), A Dutch Miracle: Job Growth, Welfare Reform and Corporatism in the Netherlands, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weishaupt, J. T. (2010), From the Manpower Revolution to the Activation Paradigm: Explaining Institutional Continuity and Change in an Integrating Europe, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar